This is getting massively misrepresented. It’s not ruling him responsible for anything, it’s allowing a trial to happen. The burden the Supreme Court set for the cop to actually win is basically impossible to show. This leaves open the option that in the future if an organizer points out a cop and says unleash the bricks on that one right there, then the cop can still sue.


If cops get qualified immunity for killing people then protestors should get qualified immunity for the finger sprain some pig got tazing everyone at the protest.



@littlebluespark@lemmy.world avatar

Surprised you could type with those pork links lodged so far down your guzzle hole, cupcake.

@Spitzspot@lemmings.world avatar

“Cupcake” was a nice touch. Ngl that got me.



  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • vwfavf
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines