Can anybody explain the difference to the Foreign Agents Registration Act in the USA and why one (America’s of course) is within Western democratic values and the other is not?
I think it’s a quite valuable information which countries are taking part in the opinion forming in my country and on who’s side of the political spectrum in my country they’re acting on.
I just read a lot of articles about the Russian Law in Western media and not one mentions its similarities to the American law.
I know that Russia puts a lot of effort into supporting rightwing and leftwing organizations in the Western world. Although it’s disgusting I understand that it’s in their interest. They are definitely not the good ones and it’s our task to stop that influence.
I am sure that we are doing the same all over the world but nobody’s talking about except Russia. We are not the good ones, too.
Just found this interesting background explainer article about the Bill: “In Georgia, Russian émigrés see familiar Kremlin tactics” france24 art
" This law is reminiscent of legislation that came into force in Russia about ten years ago which initially targeted human rights NGOs financed by Western countries and gradually turned into a powerful tool of political repression."
The bill, passed Tuesday, requires media, nongovernmental organizations and other nonprofit groups to register as “pursuing the interests of a foreign power” if they receive more than 20% of their funding from abroad.
Wow i wonder why western MIM cares so much about it
It’s great that she’s gonna veto a bad bill, but isn’t it counterproductive to democracy if a president can just veto what the parliament does? Like one person holding the power of a whole parliament?
Once vetoed the bill goes back to the legislative branch, where they can overrule a veto if it reaches a certain supermajority. Or they could change it and send it back up the line as a new bill
I think it’s supposed to act as a soft power veto by sending the bill back for one more reading. Unfortunately soft power is not a thing in ex-Eastern bloc countries
I think usually something like that is intended to as a counterweight, to prevent power from centralising.
However, to prevent the scales from tipping too badly, a sufficient majority in parliament can override the veto, and I believe the party that’s pushing this (Georgian Dream) has enough seats to be able to do this.
(Caveat: I’m not Georgian, so this is just based on somewhat above average interest in politics and in the country, following my local news.)
Add comment