If you really want to have fun, you can turn it into a drinking game where you take a shot every time they take the fifth. For reference, they have already been deposed for this case, and in their depositions, they apparently took the fifth hundreds of times.
The one nice thing about this is that, in a civil case, the fact that a person invokes the fifth amendment can actually be used against them, unlike in a criminal case.
Actually, it is a bit relevant in NY, because the AG is an elected position in NY. So she actively campaigned and was voted in as a Democrat. It shouldn’t affect how she conducts cases, of course, but I don’t think the article implied that it did.
AP is about as unbiased and professional as you can get in journalism these days. Like someone below pointed out, it’s relevant because she’s elected and it’s relevant because Trump is making it a big deal, which makes it relevant to the story
it’s relevant because Trump is making it a big deal
Trump does not control what is and is not the law. If Trump went on a rant about the DA’s favorite snack crackers, would that make it relevant? He does not deserve to control the narrative. Don’t entertain his bullshit.
Add comment