I want to say this is the fault of the original #40K#creators, being young, edgy, metal loving British men who thought things "happy endings are for girls," or "the Grim dark future is serious."
I WANT to, but I CAN'T. Because at the same time #Warhammer DID have a sense of humor, and it did have a sense of fun.
I'd swear to god if I wasn't an atheist, but "the #WarhammerCommunity" used to be different. At least until the middle to late #2000s, when many of "the old guard" started leaving.
No argument on Andy Chambers, but I disagree on the #Necrons with extreme prejudice. #ThirdEdition Necrons were the ONLY good version of Necrons.
1: They were simple. A Wraith was a Wraith, Scarabs were Scarabs and a Lord was a Lord. No "canoptek this," "hexmark that," just because some stock bro got a bee in his bonnet over #intelllectualproperty.
2: Necrons were cooler as unknowable ancients enslaved to cosmic horrors instead of Tomb Kings in space. Infinitely cooler.
Auspex Tactics review of Necrons in Warhammer 40K 10th Edition (www.youtube.com)
Auspex Tactics always delivers with his in depth review.
How many ways can I buff Necron Warriors defensively? (youtu.be)
Nice quick video the algorithm recommended to me going over some of the options we can use to keep our legions legioning.
Blood Angels vs Necrons, 10th edition Warhammer 40k battle report (www.youtube.com)
Winters SEO first 10th Ed game is a Necron one!
Now that points are out who's working on lists? Fancy sharing them? Did they / will they win?
Who am I kidding, of course they'll win. Just look how many warriors we can resurrect a turn.
OC Necron boy's eagerly awaiting some 10th Edition datasheets.