3volver

3volver, 3 months ago

I believe it’s currently unpopular. It may become more popular though the closer we get to the general election though.

3volver, 3 months ago

Aldi is great. Walmart has been robbing small towns in America without competition for long enough. I hope more Americans shop at Aldi and save more money while getting healthier food at a fair price.

3volver, 3 months ago

I am grateful for Lemmy as well. Reddit has become a censored hivemind of shit. The enshittification is real.

3volver, 3 months ago

Confirmation that real unpopular opinions get downvoted here.

3volver, 3 months ago

A valid opinion can be one line. You just don’t agree so you’re asking me to do something I don’t have to.

3volver, 3 months ago

You can justify your downvotes, call it a “dumb opinion” because that’s what you believe. Really it’s an unpopular opinion.

3volver, 3 months ago

You should be required to write a full peer reviewed essay to comment.

3volver, 3 months ago

In an overly consumerist late-stage capitalistic society, my socially unacceptable guilty indulgence is minimalism.

3volver, 3 months ago

Holy shit this had me laughing hard. Someone paid $3k for that shit? 😂

This is what happens when you let billionaire leeches like Elon make decisions rather than real engineers.

3volver, 3 months ago

Fuck the Chinese government.

3volver, 3 months ago

The Chinese government is responsible for creating a culture of censorship, don’t tell me what to do.

3volver, 3 months ago

I posted an opinion about blockchain technology and it got downvoted which is exactly representative of the sentiment. Truly unpopular opinions here get downvoted.

3volver, 3 months ago

Again I nailed it. Downvoted with no comments saying it’s a popular opinion. A true unpopular opinion.

3volver, 3 months ago

www.tandfonline.com/doi/…/07421222.2021.1912919

“Blockchain has two distinctive features that make it a potent tool against corruption. First, it provides an unprecedented level of security of the information and the integrity of records it manages, guaranteeing their authenticity. It eliminates opportunities for falsification and the risks associated with having a single point of failure in the management of data. It also helps overcome the data silos in traditional bureaucracies in which public entities are reluctant to share information among themselves.”

3volver, 3 months ago

Why do you think it would be one blockchain?

3volver, 3 months ago

1. there can be multiple blockchains
2. read about proof of stake
3. this is possible with using an escrow smart contract
4. blockchains like bitcoin are immutable, there can be blockchains that are mutable
5. read about privacy preserving smart contracts

So that leads me to the conclusion that you wasted your time writing all that with limited knowledge.

3volver, 3 months ago

Read about proof of stake. There doesn’t need to be one single blockchain. Many blockchains can run in tandem to handle massive amounts of transactions.

3volver, 3 months ago

You understand, I appreciate you. Realize you are thinking for yourself and you represent an individual who would make the world a better place if you speak loud.

3volver, 3 months ago (edited 3 months ago)

A nuclear power plant does produce deadly products.

Those potentially deadly products can be stored in a safe way. Your link doesn’t even claim that it’s actively killing people. They claim that it’s costly to build geologic repositories, and once they’re built you don’t need more for a long time. Meanwhile coal power plants are directly putting deadly waste into people’s lungs.

Take a look at this bar chart: ourworldindata.org/…/death-rates-from-energy-prod…

Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17876910/

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/fd863817-cf8c-4064-86db-f6f1abf72105.png