737

@737@lemmy.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

737,

apple and cinnamon pastry triangle with a slice of spam

737,

some c# game engine collision stuff with drag

737,

Arch, Fedora, OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, atomic Fedora based like Bazzite, (maybe Nix, Void, Clear Linux)

should all work fine. I wouldn’t recommend any distros with an update period of over 6 months like Debian or Ubuntu LTS though. Easiest way yo get going would probably be either Fedora KDE Spin or OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.

737,

Governments, schools, and companies just finished (for the most part) to move to Windows 10. So it really sounds more like a problem for 2030 to me.

737,

Pirate Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC for support until 2027

737,

it’s the back of a modern London bus. there is nothing wrong with it

737,

taxes

737,

Or maybe because his PR team really outdid themselves with the shitty car schtick.

737,

Not liking Arch is exclusively a skill issue. You may prefer stable release distros, but you won’t find a rolling release distro better than Arch.

737,

Tumbleweed is way worse, zypper is very bad, it’s backed by a corporation, no AUR, it’s honestly quite mediocre.

737,

It’s not bad, just not exceptional (like Arch).

737,

Arch is just as easy to install with a smaller ISO and a faster installer. Advertising EndeavourOS to inexperienced users will also lead to issues due to incompatibilities with the wiki due to dracut, the systemd firewall, and potentially systemd-boot.

737,

Arch has an installer

737,

People who are are not able to use or dislike a TUI install script should not be using Arch or an Arch based distro. Especially when taking into account that EndeavourOS doesn’t have a GUI package manager.

At least Manjaro has a point with it’s slower repos and pamac.

EndeavorOS is just Arch with Calamares, some welcome window bloat, and pacman hooks to have it be distinguished from Arch by neofetch; all at the cost of the install duration: the download is slower, the flashing is slower, the boot is slower, the installer is slower, even pacman is slower due to the hooks.

You can just download in ISO of Arch with Calamares instead, if you really want it (example)

EndeavorOS does not contribute anything to make the install process easier nor to the experience using it. Why it is still so popular after the reintroduction of archinstall really remains a mystery to me. I really only view it as a security risk due to the smaller team.

737,

I’m pretty sure you only get the full resolution image when clicking on it, not right away when loading the page. That would at least explain why you can download images in multiple resolutions from Wikipedia.

737,

sexcellent

737, (edited )

Arch, OpenSUSE TW, and Debian Sid are pretty good. As a desktop/WM I’d recommend Hyprland, Plasma, or DWL. Hyprland and DWL take some time to set up and get used to though. GNOME is sort of a pain in the ass, so I wouldn’t recommend it unless you use touch gestures a lot.

737,

Rigor mortis

737,

a megapint?

737,

“upgraded”

737,

the guy who invented straight people

737,

that is just wrong, Arch has multiple week long testing phases for most packages.

current example: Zig 6 days out of date

Python over 1 month

Extra-Testing

737,

i use vi mode in zsh for that reason, its pretty good

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • modclub
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • GTA5RPClips
  • InstantRegret
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • tester
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •