I almost feel like this a somewhat pointless feature. It’s almost easier to just learn the default ones as opposed to adding “-modernbindings” or creating an “enano” variant/copy.
Providing optional alternative keybindings for people who know a set of bindings from other tools makes lot of sense. I always appreciate that some tools provide these. This shows that the devs think about newcomers who are used to other set of bindings. It’s optional.
BTW the blog post you posted has only 4 sentences (excluding the quote). I often dislike articles that short, but on the other hand, at least its not blown up with crap. So there is that.
Linux itself is Libre on its own, but its modular and anybody can add non-libre software/drivers to it. Android is a popular example to see what that means. But to be fair, I don’t understand why Linux-libre exist. These projects would remove proprietary software from Linux. It’s a script, so maybe its intended to be used with any Linux Kernel you have, that comes with proprietary blobs? In that case the project makes very much sense to me.
But as you I am not educated enough to understand all of this.
Those Flatpak drivers for your Nvidia card will be installed if an application depends on it. I think you don’t need to install them yourself. And over time you might end up having multiple versions of the Nvidia driver installed as Flatpak, just because each of the applications depend on a specific driver version. This was my experience until last year on my main PC, with the proprietary driver using a GTX 1070.
To uninstall all unused Flatpak packages, use the command: flatpak uninstall --unused (but I think this does not work for the Nvidia drivers for unknown reasons to me)
Compared to other companies, Valve let the community use alternative community servers. Even if Valve does not care about the game anymore (sigh, one of may all time favorites), it’s possible to maintain community servers. This is something any other game wish to had, without hacking the system; it’s just part of the game. And people can even use modded communities and there exist some really cool stuff (admittedly I never tried them, I would play the game if it didn’t have the bot problem).
If its maintained by Mozilla, then it would be nice if this stays an extension. This makes it easier to uninstall stuff you don’t like or what to replace it with another extension doing something similar. Unless it is a core to the system, I prefer to have extensions; if its maintained by the same devs off course. I prefer not to install third party extensions, that’s not what I’m suggesting here.
Is there a simple way to download the save files before they get wiped? I mean without downloading the game and sorting out where the saves are and such. Steam has a dedicated page for that: store.steampowered.com/account/remotestorage (there is no download all link, but at least it’s straight forward)
I see there are several different ways to install OSRS on Linux - flatpaks, Android emulators, Steam, etc. - but can anyone recommend the best as far as ease of setup? With lack of glitches being the second priority?...
Timeshifts main reason to use is BTRFS functionality. It’s a fantastic tool, but I only used it previously on EXT4, in which case it defaults to slow rsync method. I really like the software, but on my new install decided against using it (I’m on EXT4 yet again). github.com/linuxmint/timeshift And while I post this reply, just noticed that Linux Mint is maintaining it now. The old repo is in archive mode: github.com/teejee2008/timeshift
You mean the default filesystem? I actually never used Mint and don’t think it’s the default, but most likely an option at install time. Maybe they plan on switching as the default in the future.
I never used BTRFS at all. At the moment I do not feel comfortable using BTRFS yet and wait until its proven over long time and ironed out even the weirdest edge cases.
Edit: Don’t misunderstand me. I know its relative stable now, but reading here and there about the problems makes me very uncomfortable to switch from the battle tested EXT4. I really like its features and evaluated last year to use BTRFS as my system drive. Ultimately decided against it for now. I plan on using it, and clicked this post for this reason, to learn more about it.
Edit: For YouTube there is also SponsorBlock, but I don’t use YouTube directly anymore. It’s part of FreeTube, so you could add SponsorBlock to the list too if you want. More Edit: yt-dlp also supports SponsorBlock for downloaded videos.
Dang, I was not aware uMatrix was not maintained anymore. But it does still its job and has its own usefulness. I like the interface and how everything is layed out easily, where I can allow or deny specific domains or categories back and forth. It shows in a table which domain requests what category (and how many). So this is to me invaluable and a good companion alongside uBlock Origin. I can also just allow only images for a certain domain in example, not just its entirety. Its easy to see and work from this table to me. Like in this screenshot:
I can’t replicate this with ublock element picker, because not every element can be picked like in matrix. Also I can see what domain each element is that I am about to block, and even just block or allow specific elements per domain. umatrix also does not save all changed rules until I click the save button. Its easy to revert and try stuff.
With the element picker in ublock its not like that. In example I use zapper to block stuff (btw it can only block, not allow stuff). And now when I want to make that setup permanent, I have to reload site and start doing the same again with the permanent block element functionality.
But on the other side, for some webpages ublocks visual blocker is much better. In my experience, both tools are good and cannot replicate the other. I even think umatrix should be installed by default everywhere ublock origin is installed too, but someone trustworthy needs to maintain it.
Just wondering what people are using to meet the 2FA requirement GitHub has been rolling out. I don’t love the idea of having an authenticator app installed on my phone just to log into GitHub. And really don’t want to give them my phone number just to log in....
I have a dedicated phone with a dedicated number which stays at home all the time. Call it (see what I did there) the Authenticator phone, which only job is to authenticate me when needed. Not only for Github, but other services too. Minimizing the risk to lose or break the device. And companies don’t get all my private stuff.
But how? It’s at my home and without physical access to it, its impossible to swap sim card. It’s always at my home. Nobody can can transmit my phone number to their sim card without my knowledge and permission.
That’s a big far fetched from reality, just to build an anti argument. I don’t know where you live, but in Germany this cannot happen. You can’t just order a sim to any address and use the phone number of you wish. You have to provide with 100% certainty that you are the owner of the sim card, as every new registered card/number has to provide your goverment id and your personal signature. Also taking old phone number to new account can only happen, if you provide proof you owned it in the first place.
If you know any case (here in Germany) someone could steal the phone number like you just described, please provide a link. This would be a huge security issue that should not be possible to happen. Nobody in the world can do that to my phone number and I think you just fabricate something that is not possible in Germany.
I see. Off course I only speak from my environment. Even if ID details would have leaked, it should be impossible for someone to get my phone number, even if the person knows my name and phone number and any ID details.
It’s actually quite hard to get authenticated for a new phone number in my opinion. In example last year I setup this new number and at first try it did not work, without giving any reason that could give a hint. I ended up buying a different prepaid sim card and the process was the same: go to bank, and do all the shenanigans and dance.
BTW sorry for my previous inflammatory language; I get heated up pretty quickly. And you stayed cool.
A system package can edit /etc, autostart itself, write to all your devices and /home.
Distro packages are not inherently more secure, but they are all controlled and packaged by the team who manages your operating system. So you trust them fully. Which you cant for arbitrary packages from Flatpak, similar to arbitrary packages from Google playstore on Android. That’s why those “unmanaged” Flatpaks need such a rights system. I’m not saying one is better than the other, just that you can’t limit the security value by just what the app is allowed to do (in my opinion).
The Flathub security rating is useful but too cautious (so many “false alarms” that people ignore it). It is completely independent from the verification though.
Mixing these up makes no sense.
That’s right, but I had a point there. My point is, that even verified applications can be marked as insecure on Flathub. That means, unverified applications can be secure based on the standards the Flathub sets. This was my point that its independent and why the verification of source has nothing to do with security. If Linux Mint does hide unverified apps, because it thinks these are unsecure, then it should hide all the applications that are marked as a potential unsecure app; just like the unverified apps are potentially unsecure (just like any other verified app).
But that’s a personal decision. It’s not like Steam Flatpak would be a huge security risk, as the Mint devs say. Just because its not officially verified. Even Valve themselves recommended to use the Flatpak version of Steam, as an alternative to Snap package. You think such a package would be good enough if Valve itself sanction it. I would like to provide a link for this, but cannot find it right now.
I wrote a simple script in order to help someone in a recent reply from me, to make running Flatpak applications from terminal easier. After that I worked a little bit on it further and now ended up with 2 completely different approaches....
No, the order of the directories in the $PATH is important. If you run command by name like grep, then the system will lookup in $PATH beginning from first directory. If its not in the first entry, then it falls back to next entry. If you have a command with same name multiple times in different directories, then you display all found paths with which -a grep in example; the first entry is what is used when running the command grep .
Thanks. I just checked it and don’t have the issue with developer name on Flatseal anymore. But good to know how to solve this issue when it happens again.
GNU Nano gains optional modern keybindings – OSnews (www.osnews.com)
I almost feel like this a somewhat pointless feature. It’s almost easier to just learn the default ones as opposed to adding “-modernbindings” or creating an “enano” variant/copy.
Wait... why does Linux-libre (and #Freedo) exist?
Is Linux not free software itself? I thought propietary stuff was added downstream....
open-source nvidia driver with flatpak
Hopefully this is the right place to ask. Lemme know otherwise....
Valve Let Team Fortress 2 Rot And They Should Feel Bad About It - Aftermath (aftermath.site)
Whoa! I just noticed in #firefox Nightly that if I right-click on some text, I can choose to translate the selection. Neat! (mozilla.social)
GOG is going to start deleting oversized cloud saves at the end of August (www.pcgamer.com)
Most painless way to play Old School Runescape on Linux?
I see there are several different ways to install OSRS on Linux - flatpaks, Android emulators, Steam, etc. - but can anyone recommend the best as far as ease of setup? With lack of glitches being the second priority?...
List of useful BTRFS tools
Hi, I want to do an “awesome things” list with BTRFS tools...
What’s the best ad blocker for you? - Firefox Add-ons Blog (addons.mozilla.org)
How is everyone handling the 2FA requirement for GitHub? (docs.github.com)
Just wondering what people are using to meet the 2FA requirement GitHub has been rolling out. I don’t love the idea of having an authenticator app installed on my phone just to log into GitHub. And really don’t want to give them my phone number just to log in....
Linux Mint Will Hide Unverified Flatpaks in Software Manager (www.omgubuntu.co.uk)
Run Flatpak apps by search filter or through fuzzy finder menu (gist.github.com)
I wrote a simple script in order to help someone in a recent reply from me, to make running Flatpak applications from terminal easier. After that I worked a little bit on it further and now ended up with 2 completely different approaches....