@trk@aussie.zone avatar

trk

@trk@aussie.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

I’m having NBN flashbacks… Labor has a good plan that’s getting implemented, Liberals propose a terrible plan that has the potential to undo all of the good that’s underway… And next minute we’re on FTTN / implementing nuclear.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

I feel like you’re arguing for the sake of arguing. Nothing you’re saying makes sense beyond being contrite.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

How is it nonsense? You have a certain earning potential. If you choose to have 7 children, you both limit your earning potential due to the time investment of breeding and the need to spread your available income over more dependants. This isn’t some class warfare shit. Rich people can afford to have more children because they’re rich. We don’t start on a level playing field. There are exceptions of course but they are exactly that - exceptions.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Why doesn’t Shorten just use ChatGPT to write his speeches?

While there’s no direct evidence that Bill Shorten uses ChatGPT to write his speeches, it’s an intriguing thought! 😄

However, let’s delve into the reality. Bill Shorten, the Australian politician and former leader of the Australian Labor Party, has faced scrutiny over the use of a high-priced speechwriter. Here are some key points:

Speechwriter Contract: A speechwriter named Julianne Stewart was contracted to provide speeches for Bill Shorten. The contract amounted to more than $620,000 over two years. Quite the hefty sum!

External Contractor: The interesting twist is that Julianne Stewart was an external contractor, engaged outside of the agency and beyond the Australian Public Service. This decision raised eyebrows, especially since the agency already had internal resources for speechwriting.

Minister’s Denial: Bill Shorten has denied any involvement in setting the salary or negotiating the contract. He stated that the hiring of a speechwriter was done by Services Australia, and he had no idea about the payment details. So, no ChatGPT conspiracy here!

Role and Responsibilities: Julianne Stewart’s role extended beyond just writing speeches for Shorten. She also writes for Services Australia and mentors and trains internal communications officers. Perhaps she’s a multitasking wordsmith!

Senate Scrutiny: Liberal senators questioned why an internal candidate wasn’t chosen for the job, especially given the existing capacity within the agency. The issue became a point of contention during Senate Estimates.

In summary, while ChatGPT might not be directly involved, the world of political speechwriting remains fascinating and occasionally controversial. Maybe one day, AI will lend its creative prowess to crafting political rhetoric! 🤖🎙️

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Doesn’t affect cars, so your chances of it being prioritised are low.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Sounds amazing. Half a ml away from an overdose to feel as if you’re drunk.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Why isn’t public transport free? That’s the sort of thing I want my taxes going towards.

From memory the cost of implementing Go cards and enforcing fares cost more than the income generated anyway. At 50c a pop I’m sure it is now.

Rather than paying private companies to implement ticketing on public transport, then expecting the public to put more money towards a private company’s profit margin why not just cut out the middle man and make it free?

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Pretty sure it’s +10%/-0%… i.e. it can read up to 10% faster than reality, but can never read slower than reality. That’s why most cars speedos tend to be out by around +5% to +8% from factory - making sure they are right in the middle, with a slight bias towards reading faster.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Can we buy shares in !speed camera revenue? Be a safer investment bet than housing even!

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

As a landlord… I would love this.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

I watched this on ABC and it just felt grotesque from start to finish.

I especially enjoyed the Ava(?) kid who’s mum is going on about how it’s totally cool, her kid loves it, it doesn’t affect her negatively… but also she cant go out in public by herself as they’re worried one of her “fans” might do something to her.

Well, ok then.

Keeping pet cats indoors would save millions of native animals and billions of dollars. So what's stopping us? (www.abc.net.au)

Broader adoption of keeping cats safe at home would have large benefits for cat welfare, human health, local wildlife and even the economy. So, should cat owners be required to keep their pets contained to their property?...

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

On desktop you get a preview of the article, which I’ve now included in the heading since I’m guessing it doesn’t display on mobile / in apps.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

The animals they catch are weakened from pesticides.

Citation needed

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

The factual answer

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Good news, they also kill native bush rats!

… Wait that’s bad news.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Maybe I’m wrong

You totally are, but at least now you know

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

That’s a whole heap of words to say “maybe”. On the other side of the world.

If you’re happy being a selfish piece of shit, feel free to leave your cat roam. When Mittens gets hit by a car / contracts feline aids / otherwise meets a premature death, you can rest easy knowing that akshually it was probably pesticides.

trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

“There’s a possibility that some other factor may play a part in offsetting one of the negative impacts of free-range cats… therefore, all other positives of containing pets may be completely ignored”

  • You, 2024
trk,
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Foxes are also introduced, so I’d say cats everywhere are “better” because there’s half a chance their numbers can be reduced through requirements for owners to contain them.

Also, cats can be baited too if required. And, IMO, it is at the point where it’s required.

trk, (edited )
@trk@aussie.zone avatar

Lamington Day

Cause Lemmyington.

This probably works better with a New Zealand accent… which I don’t have, but like to imitate when I’m drunk.

“Choice bro, put your jandals in the chilly bin” - me, doing champagne comedy sketches

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines