umami_wasbi

@umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml

pending anonymous user

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

umami_wasbi, (edited )

If that 50% refund is infaltion adjusted, I’m totally fine.

And must be announced like advertising to reach maximum players, not some blog post or press release that no one reads.

umami_wasbi, (edited )

There’s one issuse: Not everybody has the capacity to interpret the lengthy legal document. While being reasonable, when was your last time sit down and have a good read of the EULA and other related documents? These documents are designed to be difficult to read, and often intertwined with legal concepts that most don’t understand. That’s why lawyers exist.

Then the next question is: should a product a consumer bought (not lease) be completely dysfunctional after a undefined period of time? Is the petition asking for the servers operate indefinitely regardless of revenue? No. The petition is asking to not make the game completely unusable after a server shut down because of an always online DRM or something alike. The online part can go away and we can all enjoy the offline campaign like 10 years down the road. I don’t think this is a request unreasonable to make.

Your interpretation of such action’s legality is valid, but legal is just the minimum bar of ethical, and seems like there is a need to raise the bar.

umami_wasbi, (edited )

Consumers do have protection currently, just a very publisher biased protection in terms of games.

umami_wasbi, (edited )

If it pass safety standards without all those smart and data collection bs and being reliable for 7+ years with easy part sourcing I might give it a try.

umami_wasbi,

You mean something like this?

zelectricvehicle.com/t3-1-micro-enclosed-trike

umami_wasbi,

That’s interesting. I just watched a vid about how unreliable they are in China.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtRk20GL_Gg (chinese audio, no eng sub)

umami_wasbi, (edited )

For not having some infra managing “cards”, to have some infra managing app instead. Let’s be real, that infra (and managing work) most likely is being out sourced to another company. I think the “efficiency gained” is minimal, but rather the cost to operate. With apps, they can recoup some cost by selling your data.

umami_wasbi,

Can you please elaborate what you mean “web browser defined in 2024”? Thanks.

umami_wasbi, (edited )

That I’m not surprised. Look how many companies are shoving apps down our throat while treating web browser users as second class citizens. My sister (21-30 age group) only know to use the “Google app” to search the web on her iPhone while Safari is pinned at the bottom and rarey uses it.

umami_wasbi,

I believe its about the map and coordinate system used by China. They uses an encrypted (?) coordinate system claiming national security. That’s why Google maps never work in China.

Discord Shuts Down ‘Spy Pet’ Bots That Scraped, Sold User Messages (www.404media.co)

Discord banned a mass of accounts that were part of a service that scraped and sold user data, including messages posted across servers and what voice channels they joined, 404 Media has learned. The move comes after https://www.404media.co/a-spy-site-is-scraping-discord-and-selling-users-messages/, called Spy Pet, last week and...

umami_wasbi, (edited )

I just found out some softwares around infrastructures also uses CLA, including:

  • Kubernetes (hosted by CNCF)
  • Istio (hosted by CNCF)
  • Grafana
  • All projects under Apache Software Foundation (e.g. HTTP server)
  • OpenStack (hosted by OpenInfra)

To my surprise, even Golang core uses CLA too.

EDIT: Add more to the list

EDIT 2: Envoy Proxy also hosted by CNCF uses DCO instead of CLA. Interesting.


It looks like very difficult to bulid an infra without some components uses CLA.

umami_wasbi,

Golang I believe yes but aint k8s are now belongs to CNCF where multiple companies behind?

umami_wasbi,

The way I see it is that we don’t know the content of Apache 3.0, nor have a vote to chose what license they adapt in the end. Does Apache have a good track record? Yes, but it is getting diffcult to put trust in sonething today. It’s still a rug under, or fail safe as you name it, which is used by corprates today. I would rather have a framework/procedure in place preventing it from happening from the get go.

ADDITION: I haven’t read Apache’s CLA yet so it might or might not contains copyright grant clause.

umami_wasbi,

I had a quick peek into Swift and FoundationDB and both doesn’t have CLA or DCO, interesting move by Apple who usually makes anti-consumer decisions.

umami_wasbi,

tl;dr: a botnet service for AI/ML services to scrape the internet.

extra guility: the link have referral code

umami_wasbi, (edited )

SimpleX? It doesn’t need anything other then internet. Not even an email or phone # to reg.

Safest way of using WeChat on Android?

I live in Canada. My girlfriend is Chinese (also living in Canada), and while we are able to communicate via SMS, her mobile carrier isn’t the best, and so there have often been issues for us with regular texting. She expressed a strong preference to use WeChat, at least as a backup option for when texting fails us. While I...

umami_wasbi,

At least Whaysapp have the content encrypted

umami_wasbi,

then so does your claim, unverifiable

umami_wasbi,

This is something I’m unsure of. While I agree that there should be less obstacles to third party app stores, and sideloading, I’m not sure about taking warnings away is a wise choice. Especially when people are comfort and used to no warnings when using Google Play and other equivalents. Most just doesn’t do basic digital hygine. A better route is to bring down Google Play from its system app status and become a normal one, and warnings for everyone.

umami_wasbi, (edited )

Instead of fiddling with the limitation on Android set by Google, I think a custom crypto DAC/ADC would be far eaiser, though you need both hard and software knowledge to accomplish this. It also came with the added benefit of not processing cryptographic operations on a black box.

Still, I don’t know what goal you want to achieve and threat model is. If you are just curious if this possible, the answer will be ye with tons of hops amd hacks. If you really want security, I will advise you go another route.

umami_wasbi,

Yes and no. Google put some limitation on the software side. For example, you can’t do call record unless you’re in a country isn’t two party consent.

umami_wasbi,

It’s on a different stack. Telegram (and VoIP) operates on the network stack, cellular call is working on the GSM/LTE stack. Networkin stack is more opened and free to do what you want; GSM/LTE stack have many proprietary tech that’s is not open to everyone.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines