This is equivocation. You cannot freely shift between “it resembles a letter” and “it is that letter” for private convenience.
To the argument it is that letter:
You can’t just put accents on top of letters just because it looks cool.
They didn’t. It’s not a letter. It’s not an A becoming an Å. What it looks like, in the sense of its literal specific shape, is a Λ with a circle above it. If you’re going to complain about that linguistically then you’d insist it reads STARGLTE.
To the argument it resembles that letter:
I’m not saying that they should change the logo or anything, just that it looks stupid.
Seriously though - it’s a pyramid and a sun being used in place of a largely triangular letter. What it looks like, in the sense of close approximation to anything the target audience is familiar with, is that letter. It’s such a close resemblance that you’ve misinterpreted it as that letter, with an accent. Insisting it’s a poor fit is unconvincing.