kender242,
@kender242@lemmy.world avatar

“Trust in numbers” was an eye opening book I had to read for a university course.

https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691208411/trust-in-numbers

The idea that “It’s difficult to get numbers to tell you the truth” despite how people tend to think hard data is not falsifiable - was my main take.

undercrust,

For a really good riff on this same idea, I like “How to Lie With Statistics” by Darrell Huff, and it’s all illustrated!

Great, easy to understand breakdown of how statistics can be manipulated.

DragonTypeWyvern,

I honestly think that book should be required high school reading.

Zehzin,
@Zehzin@lemmy.world avatar

Statistitians are good people, though I need more data points to say anything conclusively

merari42,

Can you at least say how your prior belief distribution has shifted or been reaffirmed given the observed data points?

Zehzin,
@Zehzin@lemmy.world avatar

That would be pretty Bayesed

marcos,

Just to point out, but you need to make sure your data is unbiased much more than you need a lot of points.

AnarchistArtificer,

As a biochemist who is better at stats than the average biochemist (which is concerning, because I’m not that great), I greatly appreciate statisticians telling us off when we’re fools.

Shiggles,

The second most useful thing I learned from statistics courses was the statistics. The first was just how terrible most people are in their application.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • science_memes@mander.xyz
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • Leos
  • InstantRegret
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines