Thorny_Thicket,

Their crypto autofill scandal is all one needs to know about this company. If you’re marketing your browser as privacy focused and then pull stunts like that you lose all credibility in my eyes. Forever.

Firefox or go bust

Professorozone,

I don’t understand this crypto auto fill thing. Can you explain it in simple terms? What is it. Why is it bad?

Thorny_Thicket,

They replaced links to crypto exhange Binance with their own affiliate links that they profit from without the users concent. It’s bad because they did it behind their user’s backs hoping no one would notice. Makes me question what else they’re not telling me about.

Professorozone,

Ok.

Makeshift,

Brave had a thing where if you went to website.com, they would add /ref=brave to the URL so they get a kickback as if you clicked on their referral link.

Sneaky? Sure. A huge scandal? I don’t think so. No user data was being collected, no privacy was being violated. If I was the company doing the referral system I’d be mad, but as a user, it does not affect me at all.

Firefox fanatics just need something to point to and say “brave bad firefox good” and that is the worst thing they can find on Brave. It’s all browser wars to them, like iPhone vs Android or Xbox vs Playstation.

The article in this post also does not affect users in anyway, and has been updated after Brave responded, with most of the worst claims of the article now retracted.

Professorozone,

Thank you.

Ilgaz,

Stealing referral URLs is lowest kind of spyware/malware tactics. Topmoxie which was another for of advanced java app coming with Limewire did it.

Nyaa, (edited )
Nyaa avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Qxzkjp,

    Also, he invented JavaScript. He got on my shitlist permanently for that alone.

    AnonymousLlama,
    AnonymousLlama avatar

    A necessary evil sadly. Never enjoyed having to program in JS, but I enjoy all the fanciness and convienence it brings the UX.

    sadreality,

    What does his political donations have to do with brave's misconduct here?

    Smacks,
    @Smacks@lemmy.world avatar

    Did nobody read the article? The author is crying that Brave implemented a summary feature so users don’t have to read through entire paragraphs to get to the actual content. Of course, he goes on and on about copyright and OpenAI, nothing really about user data.

    Makeshift,

    Every single one of these Brave “scandals” are so irrelevant and meaningless. I was hoping the reddit hive mind wouldn’t be brought over to lemmy, but here we are.

    This article, especially after the update from Brave, seems like a huge nothing-burger. Just another excuse for the Firefox Fanatics crowd to rag on Brave and circlejerk each other about how good Firefox is.

    The article isn’t even about Brave Browser, and it has nothing to do with user data. The website owner is mad that Brave Search is crawling their site and using data in their “Summarizer” feature. I thought Firefox users were supposed to be against the Google internet monopoly, but apparently when it comes to one of the only companies with their own independent and actually decent search engine, they don’t seem to care anymore because of stupid “Firefox good brave bad” browser wars nonsense.

    EmperorHenry,

    Microsoft and google like to shit all over Brave all the time. Brave is very privacy friendly, the data they collect from their users is way less invasive than the shit Edge and Chrome collect from you.

    Ilandar,

    complains about browser wars

    types up multiple paragraphs crying about “Firefox Fanatics”

    dhruv,

    I like chromium. It’s there no way I can enjoy the best of both worlds?

    Grant_M,
    @Grant_M@lemmy.ca avatar

    Firefox forever.

    phillycodehound,
    @phillycodehound@lemmy.world avatar

    I like Brave. Should I stop? 😋 Guess I should look a Vivaldi again

    Telodzrum,

    I’d avoid Brave based on the founder/CEO’s bigotry alone. This is probably a good reason, too.

    manapropos,

    I don’t see what the CEO’s political views have to do with the quality of the product but you do you

    Telodzrum,

    They taint everything he touches. I won’t be a party to his success in any arena.

    phillycodehound,
    @phillycodehound@lemmy.world avatar

    That’s why i quit

    EmperorHenry,

    Nah, keep using it. Brave is really good It can do everything chrome can do, except it doesn’t spy on you and it has adblocking built in.

    MrMonkey,

    LOL, about half the points in the article are struck through now. Yet another “journalist” who doesn’t understand how anything works getting angry how they way they imagine it works.

    That’s some quality reporting “stackdiary”.

    QuadratureSurfer,
    @QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world avatar

    Lol, I’m glad he at least included the full email response from them. You can tell he’s a little salty and still misinterpreting things when you read about how he took their response to the Search Crawler part.

    stebo02,
    @stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    I’m too stupid to get any of this so… Can I continue using Brave or should I look for alternatives?

    QuadratureSurfer,
    @QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world avatar

    This article shouldn’t affect Brave users themselves.

    The content of the article deals with issues that only website owners/publishers have to be salty about. Much of what’s left comes down to the legal grey area of how to treat LLMs like ChatGPT and whether they’re allowed to scrape websites for training data or not.

    gunnm,

    Vivaldi is so much better without crypto.

    JokeDeity,

    So glad Puffin killed itself… Why does everything good have to go away?

    lightnarcissus,

    I was a big Brave supporter back in 2019-2020 when it seemed to have a lot of momentum behind it. But they squandered any goodwill they had with their crypto add-ons and rewards

    gareins,

    Why is everyone mixing search engines and browsers here? This is specifically about the search engine and the problems that api of the search engine has with respecting copyright laws. I use their search engine and dont use their browser

    capr,

    Yeah this whole comment thread is not very reassuring about Lemmy and reveals it’s just as vulnerable to manipulation. The r/Privacy thread on Reddit was far more honest.

    howarddo, (edited )

    seem like a good place to shill my blog about switching browser and search engine. I recommend Librewolf on desktop and Mull on android tho. view this privacy comparison

    JokeDeity,

    I can’t find Mull on the play store.

    howarddo,

    It’s open-source and only on F-droid

    JokeDeity,

    Thanks installing it now.

    Desistance,
    @Desistance@lemmy.world avatar

    Damn. Who knew that Brendan Eich was a shady pos.

    vreraan, (edited )

    finally this fucking, shady and useless brave shits out of the jar

    asunaspersonalasst, (edited )
    @asunaspersonalasst@lemmy.world avatar

    F me. Other comments, in particular about the dev, making me hurl.

    Only used its Private mode tho. Never went into its crypto shit.

    If only Firefox [LibreWolf] wasn’t so dogshit when I open multiple Youtube tabs on Private mode, then I’ll migrate my tabs there.

    Edit: seems people here never tried doing that on ther LibreWolf smh. Don’t worry, I’ll change my mind when LW’s private mode don’t give me the problem anymore.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines