tdverstynen,
@tdverstynen@neuromatch.social avatar

There are two paths to success in modern academic science.

  1. Be the gatekeeper for access to funds/resources and dictate conditions favorable to your public image.

  2. Do good science with as few resources as possible and get lucky.

Can you guess which is more common?

albertcardona,
@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@tdverstynen

I guess we could discuss what "success" means, and what "get lucky" means.

The first choice reads horrible, as in, as formulated, only an individual not actually interested in science but on the accolades would do that.

The second choice is, to me, academic research as usual. It's amazing how much a laptop, experience, ingenuity, and a network of friends and collaborators can accomplish, even without a budget. And the journey and the nurturing personal relationships are the reward; the end goal is always yet another metaphorical lush valley, jungle, or sea floor to explore.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines