hessenjunge

@hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

hessenjunge,

Correct, cuckolded men are well known to first ask their wife’s lover if they knew before attacking them. /s

hessenjunge,

I’m not taking this personally, don’t project. I’m just amazed how you stubbornly argue against one of the oldest story tropes of all time: the horned, vengeful husband/wife.

hessenjunge,

Amazing. I’m sorry if this was too complicated for you. Let me repeat:

There is no indication whatsoever that drug dealer guy knew. This has been explained to you a couple of times by other people.

In fact the glaring absence of any indication can be interpreted as: no, drug dealer did not know. This has also been explained.

You, on the other hand, claim the revenge taken out by Anon in itself is proof that he knew. Because a cuckold will never attack the lover unless the lover knew what they were doing.

That would be cool if it were so but it just isn’t. The trope of the cuckold attacking the lover is older than humanity itself. You’ll find stories even (or rather especially) in Greek mythology where cuckolding or just fancying the wrong person leads to eternal punishment. Also by the age of 20 most of us witnessed similar behavior a couple of times. If you didn’t good for you / grey out of the basement more.

You are doing the equivalent of arguing that 1+1 does not equal 2.

hessenjunge,

The idiots on here firmly believe that nuclear creates zero waste. In their deranged head there is no nuclear waste that will last for longer than humanity existed.

hessenjunge,

Redd… err Lemmy believes in the doctrine of safe, clean, wasteless nuclear. Even if there was waste it is completely harmless, not a big deal, please look the other way. They can be no other God… I mean viable alternative for generating energy. Also, did you know this straw man … I mean coal spreads nuclear isotopes too?

hessenjunge,

What is the toxicity and half life / storage requirements for each waste type?

hessenjunge, (edited )

Thanks for this picture-perfect post of a nuke-stan / nuke-bot

Toxicity I believe is about equal.

I generally try to respect other peoples religion but yours is a threat to the ecosphere. I believe you know your statement is bullshit.

Storage requirements are a bit stricter for nuclear in terms of storage container requirements

People opposed to nuclear know this already but why do you think that is?

Follow up: How long does it need to be safely stored? Please note the number of years.

Humanity is about 300.000 years old, the Pyramids of Gizeh were build about 4600 years ago, the Vandals sacked Rome 1569 years ago, WW2 ended about 80 years ago. Now compare the those times with the time radioactive waste needs to be safely stored (and it definitely isn’t at the moment).

Note: radiation is not toxicity.

FYI: There are generally five types of toxicities: chemical, biological, physical, radioactive and behavioural.

To be fair radioactive toxicity stands a bit out because it is (in your wording) much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much much more toxic than anything else possibly including ‘forever chemicals’.

Nuclear energy is not cheaper nor safer, you’re just kicking a toxic, radioactive can down the road.

hessenjunge,

Nobody brings up coal but nuclear stans and bots. You definitely put your favorite straw man to work.

hessenjunge,

FYI: There are generally five types of toxicities: chemical, biological, physical, radioactive and behavioural.

Toxicity at least in scientific literature only refers to chemical toxicity. What even would be “physical toxicity”?!

Maybe, just maybe, you should have read the Wikipedia article you linked. Not only did I lift that sentence from there it also explains physical toxicity. Sometimes you should read past the headline.

( Skipping the rest of the BS and jumping to the grand finale.)

Here is a good video why nuclear waste is not the issue people like you make it out to be: youtu.be/4aUODXeAM-k

Oh, so you got your PHD from Youtube University^tm^ - I didn’t know that! My bad, you win!

JK, I like to get my info from different sources including but not limited to actual professors of physics (e.g. Harald Lesch) and they don’t agree with mister Youtube dude.

South Dakota governor, a potential Trump running mate, writes in new book about killing her dog (apnews.com)

The Guardian obtained a copy of Noem’s soon-to-be released book, “No Going Back: The Truth on What’s Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward.” In it, she tells the story of the ill-fated Cricket, a 14-month-old wirehaired pointer she was training for pheasant hunting....

hessenjunge,

That’s because it never happened. If it had you’d definitely have heard about it.

hessenjunge, (edited )

You’re comparing apples to Nazis.

ELI5 for the intellectually challenged downvoting this:

Apple: Ea-nāṣir - one random dude c. 1750 BCE.

Nazis: The OG Nazis 1933 - 1945 that murdered millions of people.

The comparison is incredibly stupid. You might just as well liken a speck of dust to a planet.

hessenjunge, (edited )

Initial answer when the comment had nos source: Source: Trust me bro.

The linked interview has one(!) offhand comment by Abram de Swaan about the alleged practise. The interview is in part to promote his book “The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder.” which of course features Nazi Germany quite a bit. So I went ahead and downloaded said book. The words ‘dog’, ‘puppy’ ,or ‘pet’ are mentioned zero times in the entirety of the book.

Trying to find the book and more sources for the allegation I came up with nothing else.

While “SS-Troops” (idiotic generalisation in this case) like the SS-Totenkopfverbände did many fucked up thinks and would be fucked up enough to feature the alleged dog killings in their training - there is so far no proof whatsoever.

If this were the case it would be in every other movie about WW2. It’s in Kingsmen FFS, where the good guys do this as part of their training.

Sorry, I have to call BS on this one.

hessenjunge, (edited )

The linked interview has one(!) offhand comment by Abram de Swaan about the alleged practise. The interview is in part to promote his book “The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder.” which of course features Nazi Germany quite a bit. So I went ahead and downloaded said book. The words ‘dog’, ‘puppy’ ,or ‘pet’ are mentioned zero times in the entirety of the book.

Trying to find the book and more sources for the allegation I came up with nothing else.

While “SS-Troops” (idiotic generalisation in this case) like the SS-Totenkopfverbände did many fucked up thinks and would be fucked up enough to feature the alleged dog killings in their training - there is so far no proof whatsoever.

If this were the case it would be in every other movie about WW2. It’s in Kingsmen FFS, where the good guys do this as part of their training.

Sorry, I have to call BS on this one.

hessenjunge, (edited )

The linked interview has one(!) offhand comment by Abram de Swaan about the alleged practise. The interview is in part to promote his book “The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder.” which of course features Nazi Germany quite a bit. So I went ahead and downloaded said book. The words ‘dog’, ‘puppy’ ,or ‘pet’ are mentioned zero times in the entirety of the book.

Trying to find the book and more sources for the allegation I came up with nothing else.

While “SS-Troops” (idiotic generalisation in this case) like the SS-Totenkopfverbände did many fucked up thinks and would be fucked up enough to feature the alleged dog killings in their training - there is so far no proof whatsoever.

If this were the case it would be in every other movie about WW2. It’s in Kingsmen FFS, where the good guys do this as part of their training.

Sorry, I have to call BS on this one.

hessenjunge, (edited )

The linked interview has one(!) offhand comment by Abram de Swaan about the alleged practise. The interview is in part to promote his book “The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder.” which of course features Nazi Germany quite a bit. So I went ahead and downloaded said book. The words ‘dog’, ‘puppy’ ,or ‘pet’ are mentioned zero times in the entirety of the book.

Trying to find the book and more sources for the allegation I came up with nothing else.

While “SS-Troops” (idiotic generalisation in this case) like the SS-Totenkopfverbände did many fucked up thinks and would be fucked up enough to feature the alleged dog killings in their training - there is so far no proof whatsoever.

If this were the case it would be in every other movie about WW2. It’s in Kingsmen FFS, where the good guys do this as part of their training.

Sorry, I have to call BS on this one.

hessenjunge,

Small correction:

“Ich bin bei den Großeltern” → “I’m at my grandparents (or grandparents’)”

“I’m at my grandparents’ place” only exist as “I’m at my grandparents‘ house” → “Ich bin im Haus meiner Großeltern”

hessenjunge,

¿Por qué no los dos responsables (perpetrators)?

hessenjunge,

Walking through a metal detector will sort that out, no need to remove shoes, etc.

When you compare EU/rest of the world security screening to US ones the farce becomes obvious. Next they’re going to require a half striptease “for security”.

hessenjunge, (edited )

Which of these apply to the situation needs to be decided by a court, right?

Let’s try a different situation: the loaded gun is locked up in a cupboard. The child knows about the gun and the key. The key is easily accessible to the child.

Do you think the law applies in this case?

hessenjunge,

The law defines secure as follows:

46.13 3)

“Secure” means to take steps that a reasonable person would take to prevent the access to a readily dischargeable firearm by a child, including but not limited to placing a firearm in a locked container or temporarily rendering the firearm inoperable by a trigger lock or other means.

How do you see the described situation matching that description?

hessenjunge,

… to take steps that a reasonable person would take …

How is that a step a reasonable person would take?

And how would that be a reasonable interpretation of the law?

hessenjunge,

No reasonable person considers a box locked or secure when the keys are right next to it.

You would not consider your money safe in a lockbox under the same condition.

Arguing otherwise is quite obviously bad faith.

hessenjunge,

definition “steps a reasonable person would make” includes “in a locked container.”

No, it’s not. The locked container is just one of the examples for steps a reasonable person could take. The emphasis of the wording is clear.

The way in which you try to twist the wording is another display of bad faith arguing.

hessenjunge,

You are trying beyond all reason to misinterpret what ‘reasonable person’ means and in extension what can reaonably be called securely locked. It’s gotten pretty outlandish.

The document you linked is a very interesting read as it takes stock of currently existing law and attempts to clear up question you might have about implementation. It states as such in several places on page 1. Page 4 indeed clears up what can be considered what a ‘reasonable person’ or ‘average Joe’ has to do to properly store a weapon.

Since you also attack the legal concept of ‘reasonable person’: The reasonable person is a hypothetical individual who exercises average caution, care, and judgment in their conduct.

So unless there’s a lot of lead in the water, the average person would not leave keys to a lockbox that contains valuables or dangerous items that allows someone else, let alone an 8yo have access to it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines