@ricmac@mastodon.social
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

ricmac

@ricmac@mastodon.social

Tech journalist at The New Stack | Founder of ReadWriteWeb (2003-12) | Available now: BUBBLE BLOG, my Web 2.0 memoir at https://cybercultural.com #InternetHistory

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

It worries me when I see “end of the open web” commentary, especially when the fediverse is trying to provide a moral solution to open web tech going forward. I can’t disagree with this guy’s pov… but from an indie publisher pov, I DO NOT want to hide away my work (eg for Cybercultural), I want it to be freely available. My current strategy is to make my posts as human-centered as possible, based on my own experiences and perspectives. Will that be enough to get click-thrus from AI search tho?

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

There is a case to be made that we are due a ‘Napster moment’ very soon, and Perplexity may well be the Napster. In that scenario, Google especially will be compelled by legal pressures to find a way to compensate the humans who create the content that the open web relies on to continue. I guess I am hoping for that to happen, but I also don’t want to be a Lars Ulrich about it. I just want to be able to survive (and if I’m fortunate, thrive) on the open web!

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

“What are you doing?” This was the prompt that Twitter users saw throughout 2007. It explains why so many early tweets were about eating lunch. To be fair, nobody knew back then how to do microblogging, the 2007 term for writing short posts — 140 characters or less in Twitter’s case. Along with Facebook and Flickr, Twitter was literally inventing social media. https://cybercultural.com/p/twitter-in-2007-key-facts/

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

I'm branching out into history lessons on Cybercultural -> Here are five things you might not have known about Twitter in 2007, the year it broke out as a leading social media tool. For starters, it was termed microblogging and the word 'tweet' wasn't yet common. https://cybercultural.com/p/twitter-in-2007-key-facts/ #InternetHistory #EarlyTwitter #Web20

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

“…I spend more of my time with patrons and students talking about the relationship between things as much as how to use any one thing. So, we discuss how email talks to a word-processing program, what is happening when someone texts, or how WhatsApp is different from iMessages on an iPhone or Google Messages for Android.” https://glammr.us/@jessamyn/112565233422300007

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

In mid-2008, ReadWriteWeb expands its writing team (including two future tech blogging stars) and I put some much needed structure into the business. Also, we ink a syndication deal with The New York Times. https://cybercultural.com/p/035-indie-media-business-20/ #InternetHistory #Web20 #Serialization

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

If you had to power rank the least trustworthy big tech cos to start a new social product, how would you rank them? My list:

  1. Google (the least trustworthy; 99% of their products would be eventually sunsetted)
  2. Apple (the blue bubble gang is as social as it gets)
  3. Meta (long list of past infractions)
  4. Amazon (everything they do is designed to make Bezos richer and own more of space)
  5. Microsoft (ironic they are the most trustworthy of this lot…but they’ve learned their lesson, no?)
ricmac, (edited ) to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

I started this account on Mastodon.social 7 years ago today :) As my first post points out, I had previously joined Mastodon.technology, but I think that instance folded not long after. Btw this is the search I used to find my first post: from:me before:2017-06-08 #MastoBirthday

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

@frozencanuck It’s way better now, because there’s an active community and you can find lots of people to connect to in your chosen topics of interest. As for what I’d like to see get done, well it’s being done: fediverse development on ActivityPub. Now it’s a matter of encouraging more people to jump over from the centralized platforms (X, and dare I say it, Threads too).

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

@frozencanuck No, but a good enough portion of the web dev community did, and I have found new people I didn’t know on Twitter.

ricmac, to javascript
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

This was the top performing post on @TheNewStack last week, so it seems there is a tremendous amount of interest in a post-React future among web developers. Maybe my Gmail analogy wasn’t far off after all ;) https://thenewstack.io/from-react-to-html-first-microsoft-edge-debuts-webui-2-0/ https://mastodon.social/@ricmac/112531029962000384

ricmac, (edited ) to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Let Perplexity do the blogging for you? No thanks, but I suppose an AI blogging tool was inevitable. “Perplexity Pages”: yet another reason to support indie publishers and the human-focused fediverse. https://www.perplexity.ai/hub/blog/perplexity-pages

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Mark Hinkle, who is really on top of the AI tech, makes this interesting comparison re Perplexity Pages:
“This reminds me of Seth Godin's website, Squidoo.
Squidoo was a revenue-sharing article-writing site. Articles were called "lenses." In 2010, the site consisted of 1.5 million lenses.”

I’m not sure what came of Squidoo, after it was acquired by something called HubPages in 2014, but in the 2000s it was seen as kind of ‘lite-blogging’. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markrhinkle_i-stopped-using-google-months-ago-i-do-all-ugcPost-7202990260312555521-fbYR?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

ricmac, to fediverse
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Not sure if it matters to anyone else, but I re-branded Cybercultural as a "website and newsletter" (previously I just called it a newsletter). In the post-Substack era of Cybercultural, and now that I use @eleventy + @buttondown, and with the rise of the as the social layer on top of the web (hat-tip @mike for that framing), and with AI trying to usurp the open web, I think it's more important than ever to reclaim the word "website" for indie publications. https://cybercultural.com

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

👀 “Coming in January 2025, Nicholas Carr’s Superbloom: How Technologies of Connection Tear Us Apart, is a searching, searing exploration of the way social media has warped our sense of self and society.” https://www.nicholascarr.com/?page_id=664

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Quantum computing has taken over from AI as the tech that seems highly promising, but also has been not quite there for years now. I did a series of posts 2 years ago, and I still receive a stream of news in my inbox about it, but it still seems a ways off. e.g. "...today announced a significant milestone on the path to commercially relevant quantum systems. While many existing quantum architectures achieve entanglement within modules, [this co] has demonstrated entanglement between modules."

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

@elroyjetson oh yes, I really enjoyed that series!

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Gmail changed the web platform in 2004 — are we about to see a similar shift in web development thanks to Microsoft Edge and its new 'HTML-first/JavaScript-second' approach? Less React, more Web Components — what's not to like! Hat-tips @slightlyoff & @brucelawson for the explanations on Mastodon (but note that I'm the only one to blame for the Gmail comparison). https://thenewstack.io/from-react-to-html-first-microsoft-edge-debuts-webui-2-0/

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

This is my favourite yet, especially the Beatles reference… (via https://www.instagram.com/p/C7btGs-Bovd/?igsh=MWgyeHVnMGZmaWZ2MA==)

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

@404mediaco really is an inspiration in this era. What about an open web media collective that is sponsored by 5-6 companies for whom the web is crucial to their business (eg Netlify cc @biilmann Fastly cc @anildash Automattic cc @photomatt …). I have been wondering lately if a RWW 2.0 but owned by a collective would work. Perhaps a pipe dream, but there are talented people like @jomc and companies that want to be associated with supporting the open web. https://friend.camp/@jomc/112525445258939697

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Boomer art… ?? That has actually flummoxed my Gen X brain. I am so old. https://post.lurk.org/@entreprecariat/112518015215854537

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

After weeks of delay in closing the proposed Ziff Davis Enterprise acquisition of ReadWriteWeb, and seeing Ars Technica and PaidContent both get bought in mid-2008, I decide enough is enough. I'd spent $50k of my own money to try and get this deal done, and it was all for nothing. https://cybercultural.com/p/034-rww-withdraws-from-zde-deal/ #InternetHistory #Web2 #Serialization

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

@jon thanks Jon :) Yes, pretty soon after that went down, I realized I'd dodged a bullet. RWW had a lot more organic growth to go — including a bunch of great people I hired in the years to come (your good self included, of course!)

ricmac, to random
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

Well this sucks. Feels like an attack on web history! @internetarchive -> "The Internet Archive, the nonprofit research library that’s home to millions of historical documents, preserved websites, and media content, is currently in its third day of warding off an intermittent DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) cyber-attack. According to library staff, the collections are safe, though service remains inconsistent." https://blog.archive.org/2024/05/28/internet-archive-and-the-wayback-machine-under-ddos-cyber-attack/

quillmatiq, to fediverse
@quillmatiq@mastodon.social avatar

"The Verge and 404 Media are building out new functions that would allow them to distribute posts on their sites and on federated platforms – like Threads, Mastodon and Bluesky – at the same time. Replies to those posts on those platforms become comments on their sites."

If you're not looking at @theverge and @404mediaco as social web platforms that are hosting hand-picked content creators with a publisher's infrastructure, you're not paying attention. #Fediverse

https://digiday.com/media/why-publishers-are-preparing-to-federate-their-sites/

ricmac,
@ricmac@mastodon.social avatar

@artlung @quillmatiq @theverge @404mediaco I’ll have to go back and check how that ended up…it probably just stopped when Facebook bought FriendFeed! But I do remember it was great from a publisher pov, to have social comments coming back to the origin of the story.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines