aral,
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Just a quick update on this: after some experimentation and further thought, I feel the way JSDB works currently is the right trade-off.

While it could run the constructor of persisted custom objects when loading them back in, that would impose a rigid authoring flow that would sacrifice ease of use for simple use cases. I find the latter more important in this case.

(I’m off to document this ‘feature’ now as it is currently undocumented and that’s not good.) :)

More: https://codeberg.org/small-tech/jsdb/issues/12

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • javascript
  • PowerRangers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • vwfavf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • provamag3
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • normalnudes
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • All magazines