If you look at the edited version and then the original and they both make the same level of sense then the edit was successful in showing that Heathcliff’s presence was irrelevant in the comic even though his name is on it.
As for if it’s funny or not that gets into your level of appreciation for anti-jokes, surrealist, dadaist and absurdist humor. It’s not for everyone.
First of all it’s called Garfield Minus Garfield. Second. Those were carefully selected. This is day in day out. Third, those were meant to be existential. These are meant to show the titular character is irrelevant and the comic works exactly the same most of the time. Fourth, nothing with Garfield is good. Even if he is removed. Fifth, did your mom ever acknowledge that mistakes were made?
In order to remove Heathcliff I occasionally need to change the text that refers to him to completely remove him. Otherwise there is a ghost of Heathcliff and that won’t do.
Understandable. Except that in the Heathcliff comics. If there is any kind of speech from a character, im this case the butcher swearing, the bottom text is never from the same person.
The fact that we have no idea why Iggy lives with his grandparents has caused a lot of speculation. And it’s not even a NAPG thing. It goes back to the beginning in the 70s. Back when a kid living with their grandparents usually meant prison or death took the parents out of the picture.
Heathcliff without Heathcliff 5/13/2024 (lemmy.world)
Sunday edition (lemmy.world)
On Sunday’s I add Heathcliff to something else or do one of these portraits of him as a famous person.
Heathcliff without Heathcliff 5/11/2024 (lemmy.world)
Heathcliff without Heathcliff 5/10/2024 (lemmy.world)
Heathcliff without Heathcliff 5/9/2024 (lemmy.world)
R.F.K. Jr. Says Doctors Found a Dead Worm in His Brain (www.nytimes.com)
Likely explains his long history of pushing conspiracy theories, and makes him utterly unsuited to be President
Heathcliff without Heathcliff 5/8/2024 (lemmy.world)