Glass0448

@Glass0448@lemmy.today

Philip answered him, 2 books is not sufficient for them. And Jesus took the books; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down. Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the new copies, which remained over.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Glass0448,

Cartoon CSAM is illegal in the United States. Pretty sure the judges will throw his images under the same ruling.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lol…

Glass0448,

Currently, we do not outlaw written depictions nor drawings of child sexual abuse

Cartoon CSAM is illegal in the United States

thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lol…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

Glass0448,

The major concern to me, is that there isn’t really any guidance from the FBI on what you can and can’t do, which may lead to some big issues.

The Protect Act of 2003 means that any artistic depiction of CSAM is illegal. The guidance is pretty clear, FBI is gonna raid your house…eventually. We still haven’t properly funded the anti-CSAM departments.

Glass0448,

Simulated crimes aren’t crimes.

Artistic CSAM is definitely a crime in the United States. PROTECT act of 2003.

Glass0448,

Asked whether more funding will be provided for the anti-paint enforcement divisions: it’s such a big backlog, we’ll rather just wait for somebody to piss of a politician to focus our resources.

Glass0448,

It would be illegal in the United States. Artistic depictions of CSAM are illegal under the PROTECT act 2003.

Glass0448,
Glass0448,

so many people still think it should be illegal

It is illegal. thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lol…

Glass0448,

Creating the pics is a crime by itself. thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lol…

Glass0448,

Making the CSAM is illegal by itself thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lol…

Title is pretty accurate.

Glass0448,
Glass0448,

Stable Diffusion has been distancing themselves from this. The model that allows for this was leaked from a different company.

Glass0448,

And also it’s an AI.

13k images before AI involved a human with Photoshop or a child doing fucked up shit.

13k images after AI is just forgetting to turn off the CSAM auto-generate button.

Glass0448,

It seems to me to be a lesser charge. A net that catches a larger population and they can then go fishing for bigger fish to make the prosecutor look good. Or as I’ve heard from others, it is used to simplify prosecution. PedoAnon can’t argue “it’s a deepfake, not a real kid” to the SWAT team.

There is a massive disconnect between what we should be seeing, and what we are seeing. I assume because the authorities who moderate this shit almost exclusively go after real CSAM, on account of it actually being a literal offense, as opposed to drawn CSAM, being a proxy offense. This can be attributed to no proper funding of CSAM enforcement. Pedos get picked up if they become an active embarrassment like the article dude. Otherwise all the money is just spent on the database getting bigger and keeping the lights on. Which works for congress. A public pedo gets nailed to the wall because of the database, the spooky spectre of the pedo out for your kids remains, vote for me please…

Glass0448,

OMG. Every other post is saying their disgusted about the images part but it’s a grey area, but he’s definitely in trouble for contacting a minor.

Cartoon CSAM is illegal in the United States. AI images of CSAM fall into that category. It was illegal for him to make the images in the first place BEFORE he started sending them to a minor.

thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/possession-of-lol…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

Glass0448,

Everybody is American. They just don’t know it yet.

Gospel of the Jesus

Glass0448,

Mullvad already published a blog post a day after stating they reviewed the vulnerability, and it was closed up during their process of fixing a different vulnerability. mullvad.net/…/evaluating-the-impact-of-tunnelvisi…

That we haven’t heard anything from proton regarding this vulnerability is not a good sign. Article came out on May 6th and proton has only published basic privacy guides.

Glass0448,

Mullvad’s response a day after the article. Come on proton, at least a “we saw the article and are looking into it”.

mullvad.net/…/evaluating-the-impact-of-tunnelvisi…

Evaluating the impact of TunnelVision

May 7, 2024 Security

We evaluated the impact of the latest TunnelVision attack (CVE-2024-3661) and have found it to be very similar to TunnelCrack LocalNet (CVE-2023-36672 and CVE-2023-35838).

We have determined that from a security and privacy standpoint in relation to the Mullvad VPN app they are virtually identical. Both attacks rely on the attacker being on the same local network as the victim, and in one way or another being able to act as the victim’s DHCP server and tell the victim that some public IP range(s) should be routed via the attacker instead of via the VPN tunnel.

The desktop versions (Windows, macOS and Linux) of Mullvad’s VPN app have firewall rules in place to block any traffic to public IPs outside the VPN tunnel. These effectively prevent both LocalNet and TunnelVision from allowing the attacker to get hold of plaintext traffic from the victim.

Android is not vulnerable to TunnelVision simply because it does not implement DHCP option 121, as explained in the original article about TunnelVision.

iOS is unfortunately vulnerable to TunnelVision, for the same reason it is vulnerable to LocalNet, as we outlined in our blog post about TunnelCrack. The fix for TunnelVision is probably the same as for LocalNet, but we have not yet been able to integrate and ship that to production.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • everett
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • tester
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines