SimonRoyHughes, The structure of #OpenAI's argument here is this:
Accomplishing a task that is morally neutral and non-essential, but privately desireable, requires the company to engage in unethical and currently #illegal behaviour.
Their conclusion is that their #unethical behaviour ought to be made legal, so that they can continue their unethical behaviour without fear of judicial sanction.
It's like someone arguing that they cannot learn how to play rock and roll without downloading the complete discography of #Metallica from #Napster, and that their desire to learn to play rock and roll obligates Metallica to allow them free access.
https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/08/midjourney_openai_copyright/
Add comment