egonw, one argument I have heard repeatedly is that patent are important to fund research (it often funds CEOs, stakeholders, advertisement, law suites, etc too), so when I read about a successful (academic) patent around cancer research, surely those millions should feed into (academic) research too. Right?
Somehow, I can understand this hot debate in NL: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2024/05/18/patentenkwestie-steeds-groter-probleem-voor-plasterk-a4199335?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=mastodon&utm_term=20240518
What do you think, @academicchatter ?
Add comment