adamw,
@adamw@fosstodon.org avatar

@smxi are you sure it isn't just something that changed upstream, or something? Off the top of my head, I can't think of any reason we would bother with patching sysfs paths for cpufreq. we don't patch stuff unless there is actually a good reason to. briefly looking through the history of the kernel repo, I can't see any commit that looks like it did anything like that.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fedora
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines