AEsheron,

I never got that. Surely, it’s nearly as likely to divert an asteroid that would miss us to a course that would hit us as it is to do the opposite, right? The number that are actually trapped/impacted is a tiny percentage, and then the percentage of those that would have hit us must be a small percentage of that, is it really enough to be statistically significant?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • science_memes@mander.xyz
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • Leos
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • modclub
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • osvaldo12
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • cisconetworking
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines