Is there a simplified version of the CRediT (https://credit.niso.org/) taxonomy of contributor roles out there? I love the idea but never got why anyone would care about about the four different types of manager or whether someone "curated" or "collected" the data used in a paper.
@christof@joeroe and to be honest, I had rather the opposite impression when trying to use the #CRediT#taxonomy for a #DigitalScholarlyEdition (different beast than a research paper), i.e. that it does not yet cover all roles conceivable resp. indeed being involved in the process. Have to find the time to suggest adding these.
"Introduction into Digital Scholarly Editing“ (Master Class, Saarbrücken, Germany, 19.-23.2.2024)
Continuation of the IDE training events on digital scholarly editing (https://www.i-d-e.de/aktivitaeten/schools/): introduction into state of the art techniques of digital scholarly editing practices.
It was initiated by the research project “Sorores” (https://sorores.hypotheses.org/) and is carried out in co-operation of Universität des Saarlands (chair for Medieval History, Cristina Andenna) and the Institute for Documentology and Editorial (https://i-d-e.de@ideinfo) Participation is free of charge.
The master class will provide you with theoretical and practical knowledge on digital scholarly editing und gives you the opportunity to discuss your own (digital) scholarly edition with peers and known experts. The language of instruction is English.