TrenGoblin

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago (edited 12 days ago)

Yeah I think a brother and sister should also be legally allowed to marry eachother as long as they don’t have any kids together. Because what they’re doing is completely harmless.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

I’m not trolling. I really do believe that siblings who are both consenting adults should be legally allowed to marry eachother as long as they don’t have any kids together because what they’re doing is completely harmless.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

I did post this on unpopularopinions but it got removed by the mod.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

Lol true.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

Yeah but the reason why I’m making theses post is to end the social stigma of siblings who are both consenting adults being in incestuous relationship with eachother because I truly believe siblings should be leglly allowed to marry eachother because what they’re doing is completely harmless and is actually beneficial to society.

I truly believe once incestuous relationship between siblings who are both consenting adults becomes socially acceptable. We would see less divorce rates compared to people who don’t marry their siblings.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

You’re absolute right it doesn’t matter that those sexual activities are not natural it is still not morally wrong for people who are both consenting adults to be engaging in those sexual activities with eachother because what they’re doing is completely harmless.

I also agree that nobody is 100% natural anymore because of all the technology and highly process foods and synthetic supplements that we have today and someone being not natural does not mean that person is immoral because the only way for a person to be considered immoral in my opinion is if they are actually go out of their way to harm other people.

When it comes to relationships I think straight, gays and lesbians relationships with consenting adults is not morally wrong because those relationships are completely harmless if it’s between consenting adults.

Incest between siblings who are both consenting adults is also not morally wrong in my opinion as long as they don’t have any children together because what they are doing is completely harmless.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago (edited 13 days ago)

The point of this post is for me to give my opinion on why I think unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is the only form of sex that is 100% natural in my opinion.

This post has nothing to do with homosexual relationships being unnatural because I also think straight couple that engage in the sexual activities that doesn’t involve unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is also not natural.

For example If a guy is eating out a woman pussy or performing anal sex with her. I would consider that to be not natural because the form of sex activities that they’re doing together doesn’t have the potential to create a child.

Hypothetically speaking if homosexual intercourse had the potential to create a child then I would consider that to be 100% natural in my opinion.

I have nothing against homosexual intercourse. Seriously even though I don’t think that it’s natural. Homosexual intercourse is still not morally wrong as long as it between two consenting adults. Because what they’re are doing is completely harmless.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago (edited 13 days ago)

I made this post to explain why not all heterosexual intercourse is 100% natural.

If a woman pegs a guy with a strap on that is not natural in my opinion because that sexual activity does not have the potential to create a child.

Many homophobic people will say that homosexual intercourse is morally wrong because it’s not natural and my counter argument to that is that not all heterosexual intercourse is natural either. Only heterosexual intercourse that involves unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is 100% natural. So their argument about homosexual intercourse being morally wrong because it’s not natural is not a valid argument in my opinion for why homosexual intercourse between two consenting adults is morally wrong or not.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

The problem with your argument is that I don’t believe we are homo sapiens. I believe that God created us and only intended for men and women to have unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse with eachother to create children. Because it’s the only form of sex that is 100% natural in my opinion.

All other types of sexual activities that does not involve unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is not natural because none of those sexual activities have the potential to create children.

A woman pegging a guy in the ass is not natural because that sexual activity does not have the potential to create a child.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

There’s literally no proof that we are homo sapeins.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

Rape is immoral.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

I’m not even religious though. I just believe God created men and women for the sole purpose of having children together. All other forms of sexual activities are not natural but is still not morally wrong.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago (edited 13 days ago)

“while a majority of people who have a high schooler as their kid are in their early 40s to early 50s. they would essentially be in a sexual relationship with someone who would theoretically be the same age as their own daughter. Tell me that doesn’t sound disgusting”

I agree that it is disgusting but it’s still not morally wrong if the 18 year old is consenting to being in a causal sexually relationship with a 40 year old because they are both consenting adults that understand the long term social ramifications of sex.

Just because you think it’s disgusting that doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily morally wrong because alot of people in society back in the day thought homosexual relationships were disgusting and morally wrong but then later realized that yes even though two consenting adults being in a homosexual relationships with each other is disgusting and not natural it is still not morally wrong because they’re both consenting adults that understand the long term social ramifications of sex and what they’re doing is hurting anybody.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

No

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

1. Everyone can lose weight if they simply eat in a calorie deficit everyday. Do some people have a slower metabolism than other people of course they do. Women in general have a much slower metabolism than men because they are shorter and have less muscle compared to men but at the end of they day if they want to lose weight they still need to be in a calorie deficit everyday in order for them to do that.
2. Men who don’t have visible abs are obese in my opinion and women who don’t have a any ab definition at all are also obese in my opinion.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

Most dietician are idiots that don’t believe that being in a calorie deficit is the only way for someone to be able to lose weight.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

I don’t take any performance enhancing drugs seriously. My username is just a joke.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

Well I don’t give a shit about Americans. If you Americans want to stuff you face with food everyday and eventually get a heart attack or stroke that’s perfectly fine what you are doing isn’t hurting me or my people.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

No I truly believe you were trying to make fun of me because you just assume that I take performance enhancing drugs because of my username in my opinion of course.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

Because porn is only mainstream in America that why tons of people who are not obese that want to be pornstars move to LA.

TrenGoblin, 14 days ago

I never said that its morally okay for pedophiles to causal molest pre pubescent because pre pubescent children can not consent to sex. They do not know the long term social ramifications of sex.

What I said was hypothetically speaking if a pedophile is just having fantasies in his head about molest pre pubescent children but never actually molest or watching actual CP then I don’t think that they’re a morally bad person. Because having fantasies in your head isn’t hurting anybody as long as you don’t actually follow through with.

If someone has fantasies in their head of killing someone but never actually kills anyone then they’re morally not a bad person because the fantasies that they have in their head isn’t hurting anybody.

TrenGoblin, 14 days ago

But forcing someone to go get help when they haven’t even done anything morally wrong. Is immoral in my opinion. It should always be up to person if they want to get help or not.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

But obesity also causes a higher burden on the health care system that has in impact on other people. So many nurses get injured on the job because they had to move a 300lb morbidly obese person to the other room. Which is why I think obese people who choose to stuff their face with food everyday are immoral in my opinion.

I agree that someone who smoke cigarettes in front of other people who do not smoke are immoral because they are literally harming other people by giving them secondhand smoke.

But hypothetically speaking if someone is not smoking cigarettes in front of other people who don’t smoke then I do not think they’re immoral because what they’re doing is hurting anybody.

TrenGoblin, 13 days ago

I agree with you that if a pedophile is constantly hanging out with pre pubescent children. They should immediately go get therapy so that they don’t molest them.

But if a pedophile is just having fantasies in his head of molesting pre pubescent children but never actually molest them. Then I think it should just be up to them if they want to go get therapy for it or not.