I stopped paying attention to process nodes around 12 nm but I just noticed Arm Cortex X925 is advertised as designed for a 3 nm process. I'm assuming this has even less to do with lambda than it once did?
I'd never noticed that a high percentage (~19.3%) of Warren's references in Hacker's Delight are just "personal communication with X". Random thought of the day.
There's a bunch of C-like successor languages that say they want to eliminate undefined behavior. I've never been able to figure out how they intend to deal with reads and writes to memory since a lot of these languages take what I would call the "naive" machine-centric view of memory which is hard to reconcile with source-level semantics for variables, etc. You can't really rename all of this stuff as "implementation-defined" and get out of jail for free.
(some behavior in C is undefined by virtue of the language standard not saying anything about it)
Yes, there is the truly weird category of UB which pertains to translation time, not execution time, and it seems completely unnecessary, but I assume that's not what was meant here.
