@ovid@fosstodon.org
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

ovid

@ovid@fosstodon.org

Well-known software developer. American living in France.

I have a poetic license to kill.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ovid, to meta
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

So #Meta is expanding their #AI features on #Facebook and I was presented with the following. It states I have a "right to object." The next sentence begins with "if your objection is honored...."

WTF? I have a right to object but they get to decide if they want to honor it? What kind of "right" is that? Did they mistype, "You have the slight possibility to object"

To really drive home the "fuck you" nature of this, I clicked on the "right to object" link.

"This form isn’t available."

Screenshot of the Facebook page received after I clicked the "Right to object" link. It reads: This form isn't available. This form is only available to people in certain regions who have an active Facebook account. Make sure you log into your Facebook account and then try again.

ovid, to random
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

I've been think a lot about how often people who demand action on climate change, but only if someone else is inconvenienced. I think I've found a synergy of ideas that helps with this.

Some of this is odious and predictable, such as oil companies agreeing that something must be done, so long as it doesn't hurt their record-breaking profits. 1/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

They've also got a lot of politicians in their pocket because when those pols are out of office, they'll get a cushy board role or lobbying position if they're willing to vote the right way while they're still in office.

But those are the obvious problems who make the news. What about the vast majority of people? People like us who need to have food, clothing, and shelter? We're a less obvious problem. 2/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

For many of us, higher gas prices are an annoyance. For a single mother of two who needs her car to get to work, higher gas prices could lead to unemployment. Thus, the "Gilet Jaunes" (yellow vests) protests across France. Demand for fuel is, in the short run, inelastic.

Thus, one of the strongest tools against climate change is taken off the table, right?

Not really. That single mother doesn't want fuel. She can't feed fuel to her children. She can't pay the rent with it. 4/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

When French President Macron introduced higher fuel taxes, it was with a laudable goal that if petrol/gas costs more, people will drive less. However, that misses out a key point from economics: it assumes the demand for petrol is elastic. For example, if the price of ice cream is twice as high, people will buy less. The demand for ice cream is thus elastic. However, the demand for insulin is inelastic because if you need insulin and don't get it, you risk death.

But fuel for your car? 3/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

She can't clothe anyone with it.

If that single mother had food, clothing, and shelter guaranteed, regardless of whether or not she could drive, that would change the entire climate debate. Macron could have raised those taxes and the real complaints of the people would largely be moot.

Enter . It's not a perfect solution because no UBI solution I've seen is a replacement income. But now you have a choice. 5/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

You still have to work, but UBI is enough, with even a small income, to meet your basic needs.

Or for some, they could pool resources and share a small house. Not great, but imagine more communal living, where you and your extended family and/or friends are there to help the children grow and thrive. Extended families used to be a thing and they can be a thing again.

The main obstacle against UBI? To make it work, taxes must be progressive. 6/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

Those who will pay the most are those who need the money the least. People like accelerationist billionaire Marc Andreeson who wrote in his Techno-Optimist Manifesto, “We believe a Universal Basic Income would turn people into zoo animals to be farmed by the state.” Naturally, he never bothered to explain what he meant by that, or offer any evidence that this is true. 7/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

Or there's the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank heavily funded by the Koch brothers, which has criticized UBI as a "neo-liberal strategy for serfdom" that would increase dependence on the state and centralize power.

The ultra-rich very much object to UBI for two reasons. First, they would be taxed more. Second, UBI means it's much easier for you to leave an abusive job. Amazon fulfilment centers—which offer jobs without fulfilment—would see employees quit en masse. 8/9

ovid,
@ovid@fosstodon.org avatar

@wordshaper Expanding public transportation effectively might take many years. That means infrastructure must be built out, organizational structures grown, and convincing people to change habits. I don't think it solves as many issues as UBI could.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • Leos
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • lostlight
  • All magazines