pendingdeletion

@pendingdeletion@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

pendingdeletion,

Wouldn’t your wife have a hard time closing it manually too then?

pendingdeletion,

I agree that this image is not an easy one to see. Try this one (make sure it’s full screen, that makes it easier for me, and start by keeping it physically close to your eyes)

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/89f97386-4562-482e-a242-20bee570a9eb.png

pendingdeletion,
pendingdeletion,

Not really no, it sounds logical and fairly simple.

pendingdeletion,

If it’s your server, then yes you should have responsibility with how you deal with said content.

pendingdeletion,

Apollo managed to solve it though…

pendingdeletion,

The iOS versions still would put a video on the Lock Screen if you locked the phone during playback, this is normal behavior and worked that way in Apollo.

The difference is, unlocking the phone and closing Apollo cleared it off the Lock Screen. That seems to be the key difference here, I can force Voyager closed but the video name remains on the Lock Screen.

pendingdeletion,

iOS 17.4

pendingdeletion,

I started the video here: lemmy.ml/post/11425289

While the video was playing, I locked my device. Now, on the Lock Screen the video appears as seen in my screenshot.

If you just use a YouTube link, it won’t happen.

pendingdeletion,

Especially considering this is going on a research facility… and in fact some of their research can benefit the solar industry!!

pendingdeletion,

and times it with the result

and multiply it with the result

pendingdeletion,

Not really, no… “times” is not a verb. You can multiply 2 by 2, and you can express that as “2 times 2”, but it is not correct to “times 2 by 2”.

pendingdeletion,

Not sure what you think the relevance of a Spanish-English translation of the word “multiplying” has here… but nonetheless, you can see the correct usage of the word “multiply” versus the word “times” in my explanation above. For further clarification I would suggest a real dictionary, like Oxford, Meriam-Webster, etc.

I’m sure plenty of people will continue to make the mistake and it will become an accepted variant, though I wouldn’t consider it to be the correct usage of the word. Similar to the word “irregardless”, it’s a word, it’s used incorrectly in place of “regardless” very often, and therefore is an accepted variant. It’s just not the correct word to use. This is why I offered you my initial correction.

pendingdeletion,

Yes I’m sure those at Oxford and MW could learn a thing or two from wordreference.com’s Spanish translation, which made the same mistake you did.

Thanks for calling me a nazi though, during otherwise polite conversation… have a good one.

pendingdeletion,

No that definitely looks more like a copper pipe than conduit which is typically PVC, steel, zinc… basically nothing that could be confused with copper.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tacticalgear
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • provamag3
  • osvaldo12
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines