It isn't a tactic, and I'm not lying about anything. I get you don't get what the dude was saying, maybe your first language isn't English. But again, that is fine. If you don't understand what he was saying that is fine.
I think it's those stupid hard coded buttons on my remote that I accidentally press every so often then have to repeatedly try and back/exit out of the stupid thing it launched that I cannot remove/uninstall from my tv.
So, now it's gone from "reasonable effort" to most definitely you can say without any doubt that all the trained models contain no copyrighted data at all?
And as said they didn’t “train chat GPT on a piracy site” the scraping algorithm put some stuff form there in the training data. There is no person doing that.
"Your honour my program that I created to slurp up data from the internet using my paid for internet connection, into my AI trained model that I own and control happened to slurp up copyrighted data.. I um, it's not my fault it slurped up copyrighted data even though I put no checks in place for it to check what it was slurping up or from where."
That is the argument you are putting forth.
Do you think any judge/court of law would view that favourably?