Obviously we should be encouraging this person to refuse the papers.
By accepting the papers the private person is passively entering into a contract with the Marshalls of Mathers allowing the judge to impose sanctions because You’ve accepted their authority even if you didn’t vomit mom’s spaghetti on your sweater so the only recourse is to reject the papers and produce your writ of nonincorporation and decorporation to reinforce through habeas mentam stulta that you were clearly traveling not driving because operating a motor vehicle isn’t the same as driving obviously as driving means using a golf club and operating uses a scalpel and as you were using neither, you were traveling.
this is what infuriates me about sovereign citizens. they are so dumb they make you side with… you know. I don’t want to say it because i just ate and want to keep the food inside.
Text-To-Speech programs actually insert punctuation, sometimes when you don’t want them to. I actually had to turn the future off because it was so annoying.
Case in point it decided to put the hyphens up there on its own, (correctly in this case) so even with punctuation switched off it still does it.
When you pause in a thought, they have time to consider how insane it sounds. So all sovcits have to remain in the fugue state of crank rambling to make sure their worldview doesn’t have any air gaps to give anyone listening a second to question what’s being said.
I’ve actually seen people do things like double-down on using commas in ellipses when being told that’s incorrect just out of spite. It’s really amazing what people will do rather than just correct their behavior.
I’m guilty of that, I overuse commas like crazy. I’m trying to just stop using ellipsis entirely and move the content I want to say into a different sentence. It’s a hard habit to break.
This wouldn’t be someone doing it out of habit, this would be someone clearly doing it out of spite. Like doing it multiple times in the post in response to someone telling them that they’re doing it incorrectly.
they just think they have some kind of Konami code for real life. except it’s always about stupid shit like driving. they never extend the “logic” to other crimes.
ok, so if you just commit murder can you get out of it by saying “I’m not murdering, I’m engaging in extreme hypnosis”?
same thing for when they say “I’m not a citizen of the US/didn’t consent to the laws so they don’t apply to me” well ok so foreigners can just come in and do whatever they want?
it’s incredible how much time they put into “researching” this inane set of beliefs but waste zero seconds thinking about the implications.
I’d like to learn how to travel in my car without actually drivimg. And also why a different word for the same thing should make a legal difference. This is dumber than flat earth shit
The UK ones (and yeah somehow there are UK ones) like to distinguish between a car and an mechanical horse. Of course a car is an mechanical horse but in their minds there is a distinction.
I think a lot of it stems from the fact that when cars first came into existence no one really quite knew how to define them, so they were often just classified as horses. For the most part this worked because back then most cars could barely go above 5 miles an hour, so there wasn’t really any reason to have special laws.
Of course laws have been updated since then, but let’s not take that into account.
A group of people who refuse to be a part of society. A group who’s profile picture is the US Declaration of Independence. It is “We, the people” not “I, the person”. The logic is so circular.
If you write a whole paragraph and cant be bothered to organize your thoughts by using a single period, I can't be bothered to read it. I am going to assume you have nothing of worth to say.
“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.”
Their arguments about needing a license for driving vs traveling are dumb but I can at least kind of see where they are coming from. The part about not needing insurance is what dumbfounds me. Like if a sovcit gets in a wreck do they think the person they hit will just accept a fucking coupon?
I could understand it if they are a passenger in the vehicle, but I don’t understand how they can believe that operating a car doesn’t count as driving.
I don’t want to give credence to their bullshit but they believe that “driving” is only done commercially. So if you’re operating a motor vehicle for personal errands and such you are simply a “traveler”, but if you are operating the vehicle to deliver goods or services then you are a “driver”.
Look, I don’t want to give away too much, but don’t waste time trying to untangle the tea leaves here. It’s all babbling horsesh*t like so many other beliefs systems we can name. They don’t understand any of this and are hoping that they can basically talk their way out of these situations. The noises that they make have no meaning, rhyme nor reason.
IMO if/when people snap out of it they just fade away and don’t post about it. We all have our pride. These people were convinced they were so much smarter than everyone else, that’s a tough pill to swallow. The same thing happens with cults and political beliefs. That’s why I try to keep things light hearted and civil when debating politics. Leave wiggle room for people to come around. It’s not about humiliating them, it’s about seeing the light
Not really. Occasionally I see someone in the comments saying that they can’t reach the person they’ve been paying to teach them their crazy ways anymore, or that they can’t find anyone who has made the coupon process work, but beyond that they seem to just persist in their crazy.
I think many eventually do realize they’ve been burned and just stop showing up in these forums/groups. But you don’t hear from them, just the diehards who are too deep into it and too dim to ever pick up on the fact that the SovCit movement is baseless nonsense no matter how often they’re confronted with evidence of these little magical loopholes failing to work.
Exactly what I was going to say. They go all-in on the Sovereign Citizen nonsense, it fails massively for them, multiple times, every single official response is “that’s not a thing”, so they… continue to ask the sovcit community for more advice!? Like, come on…
I have seen a news report where they interviewed a young woman who was in a whole bunch of debt due to being sovcit and regretted it all. Her story was she was basically living a normal life, till her husband lost his job. When he couldn’t find a new job and was living on welfare, he turned to sovcit. They could simply stop paying their mortgage and other bills and use all the tricks of the sovcits on Facebook to get by. This way he wouldn’t need a job anymore. His wife went along with it, not really understanding it, but trusting her husband.
Obviously this didn’t end up well for either of them and the wife divorced the husband after finding out all of it was bullshit. They lost their home and had huge debts. Luckily because the woman was in a European country, the government sent someone to help her out. They helped her to consolidate all the different loans into a single loan, except for debts in relation to taxes. For the taxes a generous payment plan was provided, giving the woman a chance at a normal life instead of destroying her. The singular loan with the bank had a mortgage style payment plan, which was manageable even at a relatively low income level. She also was eligible for public housing and had a small apartment to live in. It was unclear where the husband was, he was gone and assumed out of the country. Because they were married he left a lot of the debt for the wife to clean up.
It was really a very sad story and the woman was filled with regret. If she hadn’t lived in a forgiving country, she would have had a bad ending. Not that she didn’t have one anyway, but it could have been so much worse.
One of these sovcits, Chris Hauser, has a FB group I’m in where he was selling people his various nonsense, and now he literally is doing time but none of them believe it and can’t understand why he won’t answer their messages anymore.
Add comment