nadiaalbelushi,

Has anyone else noticed that racialists tend to draw false parallels between DNA/genes & computer code/programs? They're not the same. They mistakenly see genes/DNA as fatalistic or strongly deterministic. There's no gene for becoming a musician. We're not "commanded" to do anything.

A few articles/papers I highly recommend reading:

  1. https://phys.org/news/2020-04-dna-life-bookjust-jumbled-ingredients.html

  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00327-x

  3. https://medium.com/the-philipendium/is-dna-like-a-blueprint-a-computer-program-or-a-list-of-ingredients-1484b34a9121

  4. https://peh-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9

  5. https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/post/you-are-not-an-algorithm

nadiaalbelushi,

I cannot overstate how dangerous it is to compare DNA/genes to computer code/programs, especially since the comparison is wrong (and is used by racialists).

Your DNA doesn't carry specific instructions. It's more like a recipe list. Almost all physical and behavioral traits are either moderately or weakly determined by genes---not strongly. We're not commanded to carry out specific actions either, nor are we programmed to execute certain tasks.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dna-is-not-a-blueprint/

mrundkvist,
@mrundkvist@archaeo.social avatar

@nadiaalbelushi Are you suggesting that there is something beyond heredity and environmental input that might be termed "free will"? I believe our behaviour is completely deterministic.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • science
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines