LustyArgonianMana

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

So people who are anti-genocide should be genocided?

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

I’m actually pretty certain the NSFW/porn subreddits are involved in something nefarious, possibly human-trafficking adjacent. u/spez himself was a moderator of r/jailbait. When caught, he made it so subreddits can hide who mods them. They also regularly delete NSFW/porn subreddits that aren’t the mainstream ones (they deleted mine).

To be approved to post on the mainstream porn reddits, you have to be verified, usually by taking a pic with a sign containing date, username, and subreddit. It’s unknown who reviews this (no mod transparency) or how many images reddit has collected over the years. Reddit, unlike onlyfans, also doesn’t verify age during this process.

Posts that are approved tend to be suspicious - it’s clear these girls are working closely with the mods to curate certain images. Pokimane for example, or other egirls, will get approved for posts that don’t follow sub guidelines or will be pinned to the top. It’s just interesting which girls with an onlyfans are allowed to post, and which girls receive permabans.

It’s almost like they are forcing these girls into dating them so they can post on their subs, and they block any competition for their girls. They’re porn pimps and spying on us.

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

You misunderstand language itself, not just sign language, if you think a universal language is possible or even a good thing

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

Actually in the wheelchair community, there can indeed be pressure to use the least assistive wheelchair possible. Chairs aren’t 100% seen as liberating and there’s a lot of nuance into why people pick certain chairs beyond finances. My aunt repeatedly fell out of her chair because she insisted on one made for a lower back injury than she has. She kept it for status, because she looks more able without the sides.

I guess ‘differently abled,’ just comes across as ableism to me. Not using visible signs of a disability, like a chair or hearing aids, can be internalized ableism. Some of the worst verbalized ableism I’ve heard has come from disabled communities. It’s a very complicated topic, not least because disability is used to harm disabled people and take away their agency. And for many, there is a lot of grief with using assisitive devices.

That being said, I don’t think people should be forced to change or to use devices they dislike. My aunt still uses her chair, it’s not like we’re going to drag her into another one or whatever. I just wanted to point out the internalized ableism that could be contributing to this attitude and word change.

It wasn’t so long ago that the Civil rights Era stopped disabled people from being chained in attics and lobotomized and hid away. It’s entirely reasonable to fear that association.

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

I can tell you only speak one language, or maybe another Latin based language in addition to English. If you’d learned something like Mandarin, you’d understand how complex, regional, and historical language is. It’s based on layers and shifts constantly. Sometimes, that’s specifically because people don’t want to be understood by everyone.

I really recommend reading academic books about this topic if you are curious. My favorite is Neurolinguistics and Linguistic Aphasiology, by David Caplan. You may also enjoy Chomsky’s works because he talks about commonalities in language or universal language.

There’s no need to formally codify those hand gestures, because we innately already understand and make them. Making eating motions (which may look different depending on regional utensils) is pretty universal right? But it looks different in different places.

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

You are simply moving goalposts. My point is that I disagree with your idea of making sign language universal or formally making even a rudimentary universal sign language. I think that would be impossible if you understand language itself. I gave you resources so you could educate yourself about why.

Yes, the sign for eating would look different in China vs Ethiopia vs the US. So what sign are you going to have it be to imitate eating in your formal language? Do you see how this can perpetuate colonization?

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

I didn’t provide a conclusion, I asked you a question - how do you pick the official, global sign for eating? What will it look like?

come to consensus based on commonality. When the majority agree on a sign, use it So then why even debate? If majority decides, why not just use Chinese sign language for everything?

If you can’t understand the colonization aspect, then please read the books/authors I listed previously. Having a majority decide language for others/everyone is pretty classic colonization. That’s part of why native Americans were forced to learn English (many of your arguments are very similar to why colonizers believed English should be established as a global lingua franca)

LustyArgonianMana, 7 days ago

Never said that. Strawman. 🥱

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

Women are not meat-based artwork that you own for the sake of looking at them. That’s not what marriage is.

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

I’m going to be super super real with you right now. Men who demand very specific looks for their women are either 1) projecting their own womanhood, who they’d be as a woman onto their partner or 2) using their partner to be near other men. It has nothing to do with the woman’s attractiveness, barring serious disfigurement.

A simple haircut, outfit, or makeup look being enough to make someone “unattracted” to you, shows that it was about you being their doll from the beginning. OP should buy a wig and wear long hair for himself if he likes it so much. He seems to be projecting being trans onto his wife who stated they are agender.

In essence, you are either gay or a woman yourself at some level (lesbian or not), if you are demanding specific looks to consider your partner “attractive.” This is why most lesbian relationships allow for women to look different btw, because both women are allowed to freely express their genders and don’t have to be a performative doll for a man - who has no clue what it’s like to live as a woman! And he should! Go! Be women! Wear skirts and wigs and do it. Go to Portland and no one will even notice or care. And stop putting your demands on us women.

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5AB0C5/

Women are six times more likely to end up separated or divorced if they are diagnosed with cancer or multiple sclerosis than if their male partners were facing the same illness, according to a U.S. study.

The empathy gap is huge.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

It would just buy us some time to actually address climate change. Currently, we have done nothing except make it exponentially worse. If we don’t have a blanket, we will definitely all die. If we have one, we might get a few years and make it. It’s better than nothing. Literally. It’s the only option.

And our governments agree:

nytimes.com/…/global-warming-clouds-solar-geoengi…

“Every year that we have new records of climate change, and record temperatures, heat waves, it’s driving the field to look at more alternatives,” said Robert Wood, the lead scientist for the team from the University of Washington that is running the marine cloud brightening project. “Even ones that may have once been relatively extreme.”

Brightening clouds is one of several ideas to push solar energy back into space — sometimes called solar radiation modification, solar geoengineering, or climate intervention. Compared with other options, such as injecting aerosols into the stratosphere, marine cloud brightening would be localized and use relatively benign sea salt aerosols as opposed to other chemicals.

They also have floated the idea of releasing sulfur into the atmosphere, getting the idea from increased warming after shipping emissions (which include sulfur) were reduced.

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

No, I don’t think it would be good to strip felons of their ability to be president. People who protest too hard can get felonies. People who steal too many diapers and infant formula for their kids ($2k worth, which is lower threshold every year due to inflation) can get felonies. The felony system is deeply corrupt. We should restore felon’s right to vote.

We need to fix the issues that elect someone deeply unpopular like Trump in the first place - like gerrymandering and uneven delegates. A vote should just be a vote. We should have approval voting (similar to ranked choice). More fascism isn’t the answer.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

If we limited use of fossil fuel vehicles on farmland, that would help a lot. The exhaust from tractors along with the bits of tires left in fields etc all put heavy metals in our food supply. As it is, almost all farmland in the US needs bioremediation to reduce heavy metals in their soils.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

No u

LustyArgonianMana, 9 days ago

How about the definition of “cruelty”? The law itself is unjust. It’s bananas to me that someone can be criminalized for seeking shelter in good faith. She wasn’t destroying that area or stealing (except some electricity). She needed shelter. I learned in kindergarten that we need food, water, and shelter. Didn’t you learn those as needs? If not, maybe you really are the ignorant one.

It’s not “kind” to simply not enforce a cruel law. It’s just not being as cruel as they could be. Just because they could’ve abused their power more and didn’t, doesn’t make them good. It just makes them less shit.

My work had people squatting under the awnings at at night. We let them as long as they didn’t make a mess and left while we were open. I gave them coffee sometimes. They could have just ignored the situation or told her she couldn’t have the extension cord. Like genuinely, as a real human to human interaction, that’s what they should’ve done.

If she’d been a squirrel or some pigeons, they would’ve probably left her alone. Because we can understand that animals need shelter.

LustyArgonianMana, 7 days ago

People always say “there’s a program,” but actually kook in her city for programs - what are they? Are they shelters? Or real housing? We usually DON’T have those programs, which is why people end up living behind signs

LustyArgonianMana, 6 days ago

Okay, take another 5 second search and look into why homeless women (and men) do not like staying in showers. Look up the rates of rape and sexual assault in shelters. Shelters are not safe alternatives. Her sign was much safer.

LustyArgonianMana, 6 days ago

No.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

Yes, and you can watch them intentionally shut their own fingers in a CyberTruck trunk on TikTok

www.tiktok.com/t/ZTL4w8Nuc/

www.tiktok.com/t/ZTL4wYwye/

www.tiktok.com/t/ZTL4Tv6TS/

And honestly, this actually answers some questions about what a Tesla stan would be like

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago (edited 10 days ago)

You should double check usernames. I never stated those things.

I have been to Monticello. I know quite a bit about Jefferson myself. It would also behoove you to think about whether what you read contained any propaganda or attempts to sanitizes this country’s history by making Jefferson appear better.

Back in even Columbus’s times, there were people who staunchly disagreed with slavery. Which also existed for natives, including the Taino. Antonio de Montesinos and Bartolomé de las Casas (both wrote extensively about how bad slavery was) were alive 200 years before Jefferson and the latter was extremely well known especially in the academic circles Jefferson was in.

For perspective, 200 years ago would be when Mexico signed their constitution. 200 years is a long time ago in terms of collective consciousness. He knew it was wrong, he just benefitted from it so he was fine with it. Which is like, the entire basis for morals and ethics.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

Where we disagree is the “because of the time and place he lived, it’s okay he had slaves.” Also having separate private/public opinions makes him a coward, not a radical.

With your Nike analogy - 1) it’s no where near the level of evil of slavery 2) I do condemn people who own shitty companies, eg blackrock 3) plenty of people during that time wore cotton and other products made with slave labor, and many today still do so. I’m not condemning the consumer. I’m condemning the owner, who had extreme power politically to end slavery. I’m condemning Jefferson, a coward rapist.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

When you say “he was a product of his time and place,” you are saying it’s okay he had slaves because of the time/place he was in. FYI. Maybe you’re genuinely unaware that’s a dog whistle for excusing racism?

I’m unaware of anything significant Nike has done controversy-wise. So I will use Johnson&Johnson as an example instead, and their practice of having asbestos in their baby powder. If you are the owner of J&J, and you knowingly sold a product to babies with asbestos in it, but privately you think that’s a bad thing to do, but publicly you did it because all the other businesses sell shitty products - should you not be jailed? If you are in charge of something, does that not indicate MORE responsibility?

Your analogy sucks because you are ignoring the power Jefferson had.

Jefferson was a founding father. Of our laws. He wasn’t some no name consumer or worker. He was the equivalent (in terms of power) of a business owner. He is 100% responsible for his actions which affected millions.

LustyArgonianMana, 10 days ago

“They have a 6½-year-old daughter,” Jones said. “And she misses her daddy.”

He was also cheating on his wife with this woman for over a year and delayed getting back home to his daughter so he could go to Russia to cheat on the mother of his child.

He should have known better on many levels.

And I don’t think he gives a single fuck about his daughter.