e-ratic
e-ratic avatar

e-ratic

@e-ratic@kbin.social
e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

This is a frustrating kind of defeatist attitiude I'm finding is getting more and more common.

It comes from a place of unwillingness for personal and habitual change. It's hard to accept that we all have to change our lifestyles and accept that how we're living is going to have to change. That there is exists some scenario whereby we all continue living exactly how we're doing now with the same consumer behaviour and expect a bit of regulations to change everything. Or delay changing until after these regulations are in place, when in reality BOTH needs to happen.

What's the point in sitting on your ass complaining about the behaviours of other individuals and organisations when the only thing you have direct control over is your life.

e-ratic, (edited )
e-ratic avatar

Where did I say it shouldn't be a political process? It isn't an either-or. How many people online who are saying "oh why should I consume less when corporations emit the most CO2, there's no point I'm not going to bother" is politically active outside of voting? As in, physically - attend climate rallies or petition their local representative. I'd wager it's a slim minority. Signing an online petition or tweeting does not count.

If people honestly cared so much that they're doing these things anyway, then changing themselves and their consumption habits should be dead easy. So why don't more people do it?

My point is this isn't an excuse to not take any actions locally within your life, which is something you can do RIGHT NOW.

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

Also worth pointing out the demand isn't to dissolve the oil and gas industry over night - but to suspend all new licensing and expansion of the industry which in this case... is 1) something the UK should be doing anyway to meet their climate commitments and 2) not that radical or unreasonable

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

People keep saying EEE as if that's a point in and of itself without really explaining how in this instance

e-ratic, (edited )
e-ratic avatar

I'm on about 40-50 hours. I'm still playing but I checked out mentally after the conclusion of the Goron main quest. Why should I give time and attention to the story when there's barely any effort put into the narrative and characters? Even worse is when the story treats you like a child. I get it's supposed to appeal to all including younger audiences but surely there's a way to do that while making it genuinely interesting as an adult.

The side quests are ok. The exploration isn't cutting it for me because I've already played BOTW, and the novelty of the world has worn off with that. The sky islands and depths, while cool at first, simply isn't even enough. The copy-pasted sky islands are egregious considering how few of them there are. When travelling to a destination, it's almost never worth dropping down to check something out.

The new abilities are way better, but again after 10-15 hours it isn't enough. There's only so many puzzles involving building something before it becomes tedious because that ability is used EVERYWHERE. The fuse ability rarely makes a difference with its unique attributes it gives to weapons, most of the time being used to just increase damage. You end up just hoarding weapons, then when its time, drop a bunch of materials with the highest fuse power, fuse, use weapons and repeat. It would be the same if all weapons was just buffed and remove the need for that part.

I'm a bit annoyed that the shrine system hasn't been improved upon or reformed at all. It sucks going into a shrine always knowing what reward you'll get. Rewards are always equal, but not all shrines are equal. For the shrines where the reward is just finding/unlocking them, why do I still have to go INTO the shrine? Just give me the spirit orb. It's also great stumbling across a tutorial shrine that teaches you how to parry when I'm 20 hours in.

The new divine dungeons have better bosses, but the dungeones themselves are essentially 5 mini shrines in one with a reward worth less than 5 shrines.

Really disappointing compared to my first 15 hours of BOTW. I'm just glad I'm not playing on the Switch's hardware. It's not necessarily a bad game, not at all, and I'll keep playing it casually... but I'm a bit perplexed at how positive the critical reception has been.

e-ratic, (edited )
e-ratic avatar

Hope you find a game that you enjoy as much as we are enjoying TotK! Good luck!

Snide much 🙄

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

Outer Wilds and 2nd place isn't even close

e-ratic, (edited )
e-ratic avatar

Got a couple issues; The highlighting of posts on hover doesn't fit the text, and the vote buttons overlaps with the post thumbnails. Another issue I just noticed is uploaded images in comments don't show, such as the image in this comment.

On Firefox dev edition installed with stylus, on macOS and Windows

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

This is 100% it. Also some people have only ever used iOS with the Reddit app and Twitter and Tiktok which are so easy to use a literal 3 year old can use it

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

Let's just hope the next big thing isn't a nuclear bomb

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

Great presentation on circumcisions and the (false) secular justifications for it: https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

Just so you're aware, if you have more than 1000 comments/posts in your history they won't be indexed and immediately available. I'm assuming it takes time to propagate. So don't delete your account straight after, keep running it every other day until entries stop appearing.

e-ratic,
e-ratic avatar

Reminds me, there was an article on the hill which blamed messaging from the scientific community to rising sea levels:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230621075834/https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4057045-catch-22-scientific-communication-failures-linked-to-faster-rising-seas/

Maybe if the media and journalists didn't waste the last 30 years engaging in "is climate change real" and both-sideism. But apparently it's the entire scientific community's fault that they didn't word it any better. Definitely not the publications' fault.

Why are there so many stop signs on American streets?

I'm from the UK where in general there's only a stop sign if it's needed, such as a junction where you can see absolutely nothing on one side. Otherwise usually there's a give way line instead, to let people slow the car right down to look, but not need to stop if it's unnecessary....

e-ratic, (edited )
e-ratic avatar

The majority of trips taken in the US in cars is 3 miles or less, completely walkable/cycleable/public-transportation-able. I don't think anyone would say no one should drive 41 miles in order to go to work, but it doesn't mean regional and local infrastructure especially in urban areas shouldn't aim towards these goals because that is where the bulk of ALL general vehicle traffic is.

These two things are not incompatible. In fact, it would benefit those who do drive because everyone doesn't need to drive for many of their trips, and won't because there are accessible and attractive alternatives.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • lostlight
  • All magazines