grahamsz

@grahamsz@kbin.social
grahamsz,

Yeah, i've reached the conclusion that gigabit is enough for now. I can get 1.2, 2.5, 6 and 10 at my house but i'm staying at 1 because it's honestly plenty fast for a family of 3 - even with 2 of us working from home.

grahamsz,

True, though there's also the general absurdity that you can trademark a single letter. Surely meta have the best case as their trademark is actually for social media use, but even still it doesn't look that similar

grahamsz,

The nuke scene was perhaps a little underwhelming visually, but I thought the sound design made up for an awful lot of that. It undoubtedly focused more on his own experience and internal conflicts than addressing the broader horror of the bomb, but given that it was very much a biopic and not a breakdown of the manhattan project - I think that fits.

I found it very impactful, it's still occupying most of my thoughts even though I saw it yesterday.

grahamsz,

I know, it seems like it'd have been so easy to make an exception in this case so he wasn't harmed by it and not allow it to set a precedent.

grahamsz,

It's also not like it's a new thing. We've had Klinger in MASH, mrs. doubtfire and countless other examples that have long been a part of popular culture. Seeing bugs bunny in a dress trying to seduce Elmer didn't make me either want to be gay or trans or a furry.

grahamsz,

So CA is a bit different. The state rules require the premium be priced basically looking back at the last 20 years of actual sustained losses in the area. That seems like a good consumer rule to prevent price gouging but State Farm are (probably quite reasonably) saying that with the increased risk due to climate change and the increased rebuild cost, they can't square those numbers.

I do wonder about Farmer's decision though, because as I understand it, in FL, they aren't similarly restricted and could price their policy however they need to balance the numbers. Perhaps PR-wise it's easier to leave the market than double everyone's prices. It's definitely a vicious cycle though, as more insurers leave the market, this risk will get concentrated on fewer and fewer players and their catastrophe models will show their increased risk and so on..

grahamsz,

I have that sense too, i feel like some of my earliest interactions blew me away and now i still use it for certain pieces of code, but it's not as strong as it first was.

With the way the world's going, is there even a point to anything anymore?

Climate is fucked, animals continue to go extinct even more, our money will be worth nothing the coming years… What motivation do I even have to care to keep going? The world is ran and basically owned by corrupt rich people, there’s poverty, war, etc. It makes me sick to my stomach the way to world is. So I ask, why bother...

grahamsz,

I suppose that's what I come back to.

My parents lived with the threat of nuclear annihilation, my grandparents fought in ww2. My gg parents lived through ww1. Most of everyone before them lived in relative poverty.

I'm not sure id take any of them over the current situation. Certainly there are massive problems looming that will cause lots of suffering, but humans do find joy and purpose at all times

grahamsz,

Yeah except that also that meant that she was doing jack shit for her constituents because it mostly didn't matter either way. I think that was enough of a warning shot that she'll make a meaningful effort this time and will probably improve turnout

grahamsz,

I really liked when Jared Polis (current CO governor) was my congressman because we aligned reasonably well politically and since he didn't need to do fundraising (.com millionaire) he actually directly responded to constituents. Like you could tag him on reddit and he'd reply.

From what I can tell boebert does jack shit for her district (and i do spend a little time there)

grahamsz,

She's definitely in trouble, but I'd wager that most of Frisch's haul has come from out of the district. He certainly seems like a good candidate, but I think higher turnout in a presidential race will give boebert a good shot at it.

grahamsz,

Yeah, especially when you imagine that they are accustomed to not having to seek out knowledge or even entertainment. When algorithms feed you everything and your attention becomes a commodity you don't need to develop the skill to actually find it, or the wherewithal to even imagine that you need to go out and find it.

I believe those of us who were online in the 1995-2010 era remember what it was like to have an internet full of possibilities that you could explore and discover, but that was the exception.

grahamsz,

I disagree, I have a 9 yr old son and he's all about how everything works. I think the problem is that it's too easy, for most of his questions it takes literally a minute to find a youtube video that explains nearly any concept. I certainly don't mean to belittle that but he'll have some question like "how can a cluster of satellites observe the entire planet" and he can have that question answered in seconds, and be force-fed ten more youtube videos on more of the same.

When I was his age (would have been 1989) that'd be a very difficult question for me to answer. Even though that problem had been solved for hundreds of years, I'd have probably needed to start with an encyclopedia and try to find enough about orbits to dig more. My dad knew a bit about space, maybe he'd have been able to point me in the right direction, but there was never an easy video to answer that.

There's an ability to access knowledge like there never has been before, the breadth and depth of knowledge on the internet is something we could only have dreamed of 30 years ago. The dream was that this equitable access to information would create a more informed and more inquisitive society, but somehow it's just made us lazy.

I'd like to see my kid realize there's not an easy youtube answer and actually go do more digging and synthesize an answer. I think he's well-placed to develop that skill but it's not something most people posess.

grahamsz,

That's very true too. I like the way Matthew Crawford talks about the Attention Economy and how we're essentially selling our attention to websites in return for "free" content.

I also think there's a real difference between actively sourcing information and mindlessly consuming it. Going to Netflix to specifically watch Black Mirror or Orange is the New Black is substantively different from opening Netflix and letting the algorithm suck away a few hours of your evening. Youtube tutorials are amazing and I've used them for all kinds of home, work and personal projects but it's also very easy to watch a bunch and feel like you know how to do something. I expect watching a really satisfying video of someone hand-cutting a dovetail joint between two pieces of wood releases a good chunk of the dopamine of actually doing it yourself, but it's not the same... not at all.

grahamsz,

Imo old people are sometimes worse with this.

100% this. We were paranoid that facebook would melt our kid's brain, but in reality it's messing up our parents' generation.

My 9 yr old is conflicted because all his friends are on Messenger Kids and he wants to talk to them, but doesn't want to give facebook access to his data.

grahamsz,

Except facebook used to be like that, and somehow we did just fine. Shit myspace just gave you Tom when you signed up for a new account and nobody found that confusing either.

Standards have certainly changed, but it's really not that hard to follow a few people that look slightly interesting and grow your network based on who they post.

Airbnb is adding cleaning fees to a new 'total price' of bookings in search results after people complained listings were misleading (www.businessinsider.com)

Airbnb guests will soon be able to see the total cost of their stay, including cleaning and service fees, before taxes in a step towards better pricing transparency on the platform.

grahamsz,

The economics just don't work for short stays. It's expensive to clean an entire house, particularly if that involves washing multiple sets of sheets and towels.

Hotels are set up to be efficient at that with commercial laundry equipment and lots of identical rooms with no travel time between them.

Airbnb is almost always better value if you need multiple days and multiple rooms, but if you need one room for 2 nights then it can only really compete if labor costs are really low

grahamsz, (edited )

I'm not sure the prices even are that wonky. The cost to have someone drive to a property, clean it, and wash/dry all the bedding is by far the highest cost of anything related to running a property rental (at least in the US). That's naturally going to make it abnormally expensive for short stays (compared to a hotel) and much cheaper for longer ones.

The problem really is that AirBnB is trying to position itself as an expedia competitor and not a vrbo competitor, and changing that will change how they are valued.

Edit: I think tiering pricing makes more sense here too. A host could easily say that the first night is $350 and subsequent nights are $150 (or something like that) and then it'd represent their cost structure better without explicitly calling out a high cleaning fee.

I think AirBnb screwed up in the same way that eBay did, where they let the price not be the price. In my opinion eBay should have made sellers enter their location and the weight/dims of the item and it'd work out a fair shipping price and not let that be changed.

grahamsz,

A few apps like Photoshop and Fusion360 keep my running Windows. The graphics card situation is also a giant pain in the ass, my laptop has a Radeon and a RTX 3080 and I can't get any kind of prime offloading to work. I'd really like to use the radeon unless i'm running something intensive that needs 3d acceleration, but i think I'd likely have to reboot to switch between them.

That leaves me running the RTX chip the whole time so the laptop draws about 40W at idle, when running windows it's more like 10W because the nvidia chip is completely off.

grahamsz,

I think the Intel/nvidia combo works (with a lot of caveats) but the amd/nvidia one seems way less supported. Not a massive deal for me as I mostly use it as a desktop replacement machine, but it does suck to only get about 2.5 hrs of battery life on the rare occasions that i'm untethered.

grahamsz,

Yeah, though some of that's genetics too. I'm a couple years younger than him and honestly think I look at least a couple of years younger than him. I eat fairly well, but definitely have occasional donuts and frequent pizza.

grahamsz,

I think we should feed Lemmy precisely 1977 comments each day, then it will live forever.

Greetings from kbin

Do lifetime warranties make something BIFL?

I’d like a place where warranties aren’t a factor when discussing BIFL items. I know that some feel otherwise but for me the appeal of BIFL is NOT frugality (though it often overlaps) but rather in owning high quality, long lasting, repairable items. It also has an aspect of sustainability as I hope to only buy one of...

grahamsz,

I work in the clothing space and most people are moving away from them because there's been a sudden very sharp uptick in abuse. We had a product that we made for a major retailer that have a lifetime guarantee against defects in workmanship. Certainly, there were always some consumers who'd legitimately wear it out and ask for a replacement every 5 years, but the number that would actually follow through was comparatively small.

However, the returns skyrocketed a few years ago and we actually went to the trouble of having all the product collected and shipped back to us so we could analyze it.

  • Lots of it was filthy like consumers would get it dirty and then return it rather than washing it
  • A significant portion was different products, some even from other stores. I guess store employees aren't willing to push back on customers, and frankly, I don't blame them
  • Some were weirdly damaged - we've been in this industry a long time and know what normal wear looks like and know exactly where holes are going to show up if a product is badly made. I've seen things that were obviously cut with scissors or looked like they'd been dragged across concrete.
  • A good chunk looked brand new, perhaps people bought it for a weekend event and returned it. Certainly, they could be dissatisfied with the purchase, but that typically only amounts to 1-2% of our buyers.

I don't really understand the shift, but it really feels like a few shitty people ruining a good thing for everyone else.

grahamsz,

I don't think the other returned products were lifetime guaranteed. Look like they found a worn out piece from their closet and returned it to the retailer claiming it was an older version of the product they were trying to replace it with - maybe they genuinely believed that but it seemed more deliberate

grahamsz,

Usually it's phrased as a warranty against defects in workmanship. I had American Giant replace a hoodie where one of the seams started to come unstitched, but I infer that they wouldn't have covered it if it were due to regular wear and tear. (also pretty sure they moved away from lifetime warrantis too)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines