carl_marks_1312,
@carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml avatar

Interest in America joining was fairly immediate after America adopted the Truman doctrine

A reactionary that knowingly or self-deceptively dropped atomic bombs on Japan, even though Japan was pretty much defeated already.

Which was a response to Stalin enacting the coup in Czechoslovakia after the Communist party in Italy and France failed to make any gains. This of course happened after the Soviet and Nazi split Poland between themselves.

Conveniently jumping timelines and failing to mention the Munich conference, conflating non-aggression pacts with splinting Poland,…

Thus the north Atlantic treaty was formed.

A defensive alliance created in 1949 a significant escalation on a thinly veiled pre-text used by western capitalists.

The Warsaw pact was a defense agreement? Or are you talking about prior to 55’?

A reaction to the NATO formation, came the soviet unions defensive alliance the warsaw pact in 1955. Meaning, the first major escalation came from the Capitalist countries after WW2.

You said it yourself earlier, NATO wasn’t exactly confident in the federation’s ability to maintain its commitment to democracy. But there was some cautious optimism, military spending was cut drastically, and there was a large demobilization of military equipment and personal.

I know it wasn’t signed and fuck Gorby for not getting it in writing, but NATO (a defensive alliance) should have been disbanded after the Warsaw pact disbanded. Increasing member states when everything was friendly, communicates geopolitically that there is a threat. What threat if theres no more SU and Yeltsin and Putin being friendly?

NATO had serious talks about it’s future, delisted Russia as a sworn enemy, and started to be involved in more humanitarian aid.

It was a defensive alliance, you’re arguiing for a world police which basically means keeping the US as a hegemon. Fuck that.

Things really don’t start to deteriorate until Kosovo in 99’. For some reason this time, Russia wouldn’t allow intervention to pass the UN security council, let alone help intervene like in Bosnia. After the conflict was over nato wanted to work with Russia to act as peace keepers, Russia for some reason this time wanted to act independently to look after their serbs. NATO was afraid it would partition the city and lead to future break away conflicts.

Does not justify having kept NATO after the dissolution of the SU.

US even handpicked Putin

How?

www.rferl.org/a/…/29462317.html

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • worldnews@lemmy.ml
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines