homesweethomeMrL

@homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

homesweethomeMrL,

We know the answer: only the destruction of the republiQan party will get us back to where we should be.

That’s also the problem.

homesweethomeMrL,

I’d go back and introduce enough backdoors to make them utterly incapable of staying in business. Steal all the documents. Then steal things. Then talk my way into being fired. Then start popping off the backdoors one at a time. Post all the documents for free. Something something shorting the stock.

homesweethomeMrL,

Good ol’ Nole. That guy’s always up to no good.

US airlines are suing the Biden administration over a new rule to make certain fees easier to spot (apnews.com)

U.S. airlines are suing to block the Biden administration from requiring greater transparency over fees that the carriers charge their passengers, saying that a new rule would confuse consumers by giving them too much information during the ticket-buying process....

homesweethomeMrL,

What an excellent use of the court’s time.

homesweethomeMrL,

Exxon’s legal department has really gone off the reservation

homesweethomeMrL,

Oooh ooh can it take a decade and can we end it by not doing a fucking thing? Y’know like last time?

homesweethomeMrL,

One can only hope.

homesweethomeMrL,

That is the most Dude response possible. I raise an oat soda to you.

homesweethomeMrL,

What was all that shit about Vietnam, man?!

homesweethomeMrL,

Fucking nihilists. Nothing changes.

homesweethomeMrL,

it’s newsweek.

homesweethomeMrL,

Hey excitingly new progressives who won’t vote - here’s one reason why you should. Because not voting is what gets you nazis.

homesweethomeMrL,

TFW they have to find one person to state this for the headline.

homesweethomeMrL,

I have so many questions about the photograph

homesweethomeMrL,

China: offers affordable EV

US Auto: NOoooooooooooooo!!

homesweethomeMrL,

I see your reasonable, logical arguments, and raise another Affordable EV.

homesweethomeMrL,

It’s been sad watching the cult take over all former friends and family. Reason is gone. Logic is gone. All they know is slogans. And since they’re all in the cult, no one ever gets out.

homesweethomeMrL,

I assume it’s a bot somewhere. But as a snuggleowl bot myself - two upvotes!

homesweethomeMrL,

w/r/t Biden doing for Palestine as a key progressive effort; I think as the NYT article that got posted here a day or to ago spelled out, Biden’s been very much in Bibi’s face behind closed doors, but our favorite college student doesn’t know or care how mideast diplomacy works, or its history, risks, and assumptions.

Frankly, that’s on us for assuming and posting that he “supports genocide”. He does not, and has said so repeatedly. Maybe if Bush(s) had invaded Israel instead of Iraq (y’know, where we know very well they have WMD) and had taken control of that government we’d be able to dictate what we want the way so many seem to think we can, but it doesn’t work so simply. He’s working on it, much more diligently and competently than anyone else who’s running for president is able to.

And frankly at this point, spreading this lie that Biden “supports” the obvious genocidal actions of Netanyahu is exactly the same as what a russian troll trying to divide Democrats, limit turnout, and swing the election to trump would do.

homesweethomeMrL,

News articles are supposed to be as neutral and factual as possible

That is the conventional thinking, however we can’t remove all perspective from a news article - it’s not technically possible. So the “as possible” part of the statement is really a kind of magic that allows us to presume news agencies are in fact trying to limit any one perspective to the maximum possible while still being recognized as written communication.

But they’re not. Almost all corporate news has an agreed-upon point-of-view that they edit from. This is partially just practicality - if everyone writes to the agreed POV, then they don’t have to edit much. Things move faster when they’re in alignment.

And that agreed-upon-point-of-view is not neutral, although they possibly intended it to be read that way.

Opinion articles are there to let writers loose and say whatever - but make no mistake, news articles have opinions. Consider use of the term “environmentalist”.

As an old, I remember when it wasn’t ever a thing. And I distinctly remember hearing it for the first time - in a newscast. I remember thinking, “what? Who’s not an environmentalist? Does someone not live in an environment?” Sort of like “Oxygenists today said people aren’t breathing”.

But it was being used as a way to separate those who cared about pollution, extinction, and yes climate change, from those who didn’t.

It was envisioned as a “neutral” term - as factual as possible - but it said on the face of it, “environmentalists said …” meaning not us. It was a bias still in use today. Artificial and wielded as needed. Are you an environmentalist? You know - one of them?

homesweethomeMrL,

Well, not yet.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tester
  • tsrsr
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Durango
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • vwfavf
  • slotface
  • ethstaker
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • PowerRangers
  • Leos
  • ngwrru68w68
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • All magazines