W6KME, 1 month ago @ai6yr Without a causative link, you've only got statistics, not science. And their statistics are admittedly quite shaky and vague. If you can't make a definitive point with statistics, you don't have any point at all, just a vague correlation. Their headline goes from vague speculation to outright lie. Not a good look for whoever "ScienceAlert" is.
@ai6yr Without a causative link, you've only got statistics, not science. And their statistics are admittedly quite shaky and vague.
If you can't make a definitive point with statistics, you don't have any point at all, just a vague correlation.
Their headline goes from vague speculation to outright lie. Not a good look for whoever "ScienceAlert" is.