They're working on a DB version in parallel that will provide better scalability, performance and realtime #collaboration (#RTC). They'll charge for RTC.
Unfortunately, this seems to be the end for #orgdown markup as they are implementing #Markdown only now and a conversion feature later on. 😞
Therefore, logseq is not an option for me any more and I'll need to think about a migration strategy for my wife.
@publicvoit denote-like approach can be easily adjusted to different naming. Everything else you describe also doesn’t sound too hard to implement for emacs. Or is it?
@mykhaylo Would love for denote and @publicvoit tools (e.g. filetags) to be compatible with each other. The filename schemes already carry similar information. If this already exists somehow, would love to know.
@publicvoit@skizye maybe you could write an article on the difference of the approach with denote? Because strictly speaking denote is not about zettelkasten, it’s about naming files.
@publicvoit@skizye thanks for the article. If for example you want to make a note on using lsp server in emacs, which then relates to emacs, lsp, python and clojure (for example), where do you put it? Or how do you label it?
Add comment