sun,
@sun@shitposter.world avatar

What is actually in this anti-Semitism bill. What's actually in it not interpretation

ageha,
@ageha@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu avatar

@sun
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text

hmmk, it's about commandeering the nondiscrimination requirements for receiving federal dollars

first it tries to conflate "jewish" the religion with an "ethnicity" so can treat it as can't-discriminate-material

says "antisemitism is on the rise in schools" to hint where this is targetted

discrimination investigations will use the IHRA definition ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_definition_of_antisemitism i guess ) which includes expressing hatred "towards jewish community institutions and religious facilities", so more conflating religion and ethnicity

along with these other "examples" they list, most notably "saying israel bad
2024-1714610613.png
2024-1714610691.png
2024-1714610907.png
2024-1714611133.png

2024-1714610691.png
2024-1714610907.png
2024-1714611133.png

sun,
@sun@shitposter.world avatar

@ageha literally by definition dual citizens have divided loyalty lol

zaitcev,

@sun @ageha Yeah but ...
I have my excuses!
In order to denounce a citizenship, I must produce a document from the federal tax inspection that I don't have any unpaid taxes. But they aren't giving me one because I left so long ago that there were no computerized records back then, and my former local office misplaced my file in one of the moves.
Also I have to pay $2,500 fee, which is a small price to pay for freedom TBH

lanodan,
@lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me avatar

@ageha @sun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_definition_of_antisemitism#Original_drafter is a pretty interesting part of it's very long Criticism section…

eriner,
@eriner@noauthority.social avatar

@sun I'm literally looking for the text now to attach to the thread I just RT'd

sun,
@sun@shitposter.world avatar
sun,
@sun@shitposter.world avatar

@eriner welp

sun,
@sun@shitposter.world avatar

@eriner Please also note that the definition that was adopted by congress is completely open-ended:

jeffcliff,
@jeffcliff@shitposter.world avatar

@sun @eriner supreme court will strike that down as unconstitutional for sure

shrimp,
@shrimp@shrimpposter.club avatar

@jeffcliff @eriner @sun do you really trust this supreme court cause i sure don't lmao

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • PowerRangers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • vwfavf
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • modclub
  • provamag3
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • everett
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • All magazines