Danterious

@Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Other accounts:

@Danterious

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Danterious,

I want to watch that.

Danterious,

Wait the pole can talk to the humans? I imagined that the poles could only talk to each other and observe how the humans in their neighborhood live their lives and talk to each other about it. But your version sounds fun. I mean it might even work as a small webcomic.

Danterious,

To add on I think it is also a thing of social norms. So if a plurality in a post starts being argumentative then it can become the default way others talk in other parts of the post.

So it sort of is an “Embody the change you want to see” thing.

You can be banned from lemmy.blahaj.zone for calling out transphobia

I recently made a new account on lemmy.blahaj.zone, because I’ve been harassed and doxxed on my old account and I wanted a fresh start with a more lighthearted online identity that I could be more open about my gender identity on. I’d heard blahaj zone was good for trans people, so I made my account there. And yeah,...

Danterious,

I just wanted to thank you for giving actionable advice to them and having a pleasant tone.

Danterious,

No centralisation means there’s no canonical single source of truth.

I don’t think this is a bad thing. Having centralization leads to one narrative taking over the post. With more decentralization, there is a natural way for different kinds of conversation to take root.

Also, this is going to occur much more when people get the ability to block instances anyway.

Danterious,

I hope so.

Danterious, (edited )

Thank you! The !technology chart is surprising. I think what you suggested is the most likely reason why that’s happening. Also maybe later I’ll put up the code that I used to scrape the data so you guys can double-check if there were any bugs.

Edit: wording

Danterious, (edited )

Yeah, I was thinking of scraping the active users as well but from what I observed when trying different instances, the active users aren’t counted separately by instance so the active users would just be all the active users on that community no matter where they are from. That info is already available on lemmyverse.net so I didn’t want to copy it.

I bet there is a way to do this with the Lemmy API but I don’t have a good understanding on how to use it so I am just waiting for someone more knowledgeable than me to try this again but with more care.

Edit: Unrelated but I went through the subreddit stats for a bunch of subs and it seems like posts and comments for a lot of them have dropped off after the API changes so that seems bad for Reddit and good for us.

Danterious,

That’s why I included the words informal, but I get your point I hope it doesn’t become too bureaucratic and is just a place for admins to build trust and communication with each other so federation/defederation is a more conscious decision.

Danterious,

I agree with you. What do you think we as users could do to make this happen?

Also on a sidenote has anyone thought of creating a publicly owned instance before? I wonder how that would work.

Danterious,

Ok great.

Danterious, (edited )

Is there a way to see all the communities on your instances c/all?

Edit: Nvm it is at the top of the page.

Danterious,

I found it. You have to press the communities tab at the top of your instance and press all

Danterious,

lemmy.world users can’t see the Beehaw community.

Edit: And I have only posted this in two communities.

Danterious,

Exactly the point that I wanted to get across.

Danterious,

Safe spaces are tools. Tools can be used for good and bad.

The same way that terrorists use E2EE chats doesn’t mean that we should ban them.

Danterious,

This is why both safe spaces and public spaces are needed so that ideas/behaviors have one place to form/grow and another to negotiate with other ideas/behaviors.

The way that each of these spaces is moderated becomes important.

Danterious,

That’s fair. I would hope that someone who has a genuine constructive criticism would be able to communicate it, but it might not hurt to have a rule reminding them to acknowledge and affirm the core concept before providing criticism. I can see how someone being a little curt and just voicing the criticism might come across as being anti- whatever the topic is.

They don’t necessarily have to outright right say I agree with the core concept in every comment but instead they could add on to what is being said. For example, if someone came to me with real criticism about an idea I had but didn’t at least try to offer anything on how to make the idea better it can come across in an online forum as being contrarian or argumentative instead of constructive.

No disrespect to the folks at beehaw, I may still make an alt account there. I appreciate what they’ve built, but it wasn’t the best fit for what I was looking to join. Ideally I’d be able to participate in their communities with this account, but I totally understand why they defederated with lemmy.world.

That’s fine but I mean why not join an instance that is federated with both of them?

Edit: wording

Danterious,

I think you would like this video.

Social rationality

Edit: by the way I think you bring an interesting viewpoint and I thank you for the effort put into this comment.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tacticalgear
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • provamag3
  • osvaldo12
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines