Danterious

@Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Other accounts:

@Danterious

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Danterious, (edited )

I loved that show. Any other time travel stuff you’d recommend? Shows or books.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious, (edited )

China is not socialist no matter what they say.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious,

comment practice where they claim ownership

Yeah that’s definitely what a creative commons license does.

For people that want to know what it is read the link.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men (www.researchgate.net)

Our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted more often than men's [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman's gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.

Danterious,

Relate it to something that they do care about and show how it negatively affects that.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious,

Unrelated question but why did you not upvote your own comment?

on lemmy.world it automatically does that for you.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious, (edited )

weird

Edit: It most like was a federation problem on my end.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious,

I think that in the long term that there is one thing going for the truth: It is more coherent and more predictive of what is to come next.

If a country does a campaign that tries to fabricate a story from scratch if they aren’t very careful there will be some form of incoherence eventually if there is any slip up. That’s why its always easier to just frame the truth in positive or negative lights instead because it removes the need to try and create coherent stories.

And yes I know that there are people that believe incoherent truths about the world but that is mainly because it doesn’t actually affect most of the actions that they take on a day to day basis so they don’t have an actual incentive to improve their understanding of the world. If they need to make decisions based on that information they will make bad decisions until their understanding of the world has changed or they are out competed by people with more accurate beliefs.

T.L.D.R.

Lies take consistent effort to keep straight and eventually they’ll fuck up, Spin is easier and more effective for changing values, and people tend to have more accurate beliefs if they are actually useful to have them.

Edit: grammar

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious,

Do you have a link to the original audio for the conversation? couldn’t find it in the article.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious, (edited )

Once these get advanced enough and the human cost of starting a conflict goes to zero (because they most likely will be able to scale these to whatever kind of conflict is wanted) why wouldn’t countries be more likely to start a war.

Or if most regular military battles only become an economic problem then why wouldn’t an enemy turn towards more terrorist like attacks like happened in Russia with ISIS.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

I've noticed a lot of chill religious people on Lemmy.

Idk why I’m mentioning it but compared to a lot of other online platforms where if religion is being mentioned outside of a religious community it is really in your face on Lemmy it seems like when it is mentioned outside of that kind of community it seems relevant to whatever they are saying and are generally nice....

Google Search is getting even worse for independent sites (www.theverge.com)

In February, HouseFresh managing editor Gisele Navarro called out publishers like BuzzFeed and Rolling Stone as some of the culprits that publish content about air purifiers despite a lack of expertise — but Google rewards these sites with high rankings all the same. The result is a search results page filled with SEO-first...

Danterious,

Well I think you could do a few things.

A) Talk to your admin about harassment and ask them to look into this when they can.

B) Start posting in communities that have a higher intolerance to this kind of behaviour (I’m thinking Beehaw communities)

C) Make a post on !anticorporate and see if you can get even more people doing it.

I’m actually thinking of adding these to my posts as well now just to see more people’s reactions. Do you know of a way to automatically add it to the end of your posts?

Edit: grammar and spelling.

Danterious,

Oh wait I forgot lemmy.world isn’t federated with beehaw.org anymore so you can’t use those communities. Because usually most of the kinds of comments you would be getting would be removed by now.

Well you can get a second account to join beehaw communities or again just reporting and all that stuff.

But honestly I really think you should make a post on !anticorporate getting more people to do it because this is the kind of thing that would be interesting to them.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

Danterious,

FYI I’ve found that if you download a text expander it allows you to make shortcuts for these kinds of texts making it much easier to add automatically.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.en

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines