Isoprenoid

@Isoprenoid@programming.dev

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Isoprenoid,

Is the y-axis scale logarithmic?

Isoprenoid,

https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/ef07c0f0-85b5-4351-b066-413d92a3484a.jpeg

Isoprenoid,

Cue the left-wingers being rage-baited about the right wingers protesting the new “woke” leaf blowers.

All the while the leaf blower manufacturer is getting free publicity.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=06yy88tLWlg

Isoprenoid,

This is why I never look up supporting evidence. I rather just stay in my ignorance. /s

Isoprenoid,

dig a little deeper beyond what gets radio play and you can find some good shit.

Don’t leave us hanging! What are your suggestions?

Isoprenoid,

Wait, you don’t get all your neuroscience advice from www.bananatreelog.com (now www.mindmypeelings.com)?

If we can’t trust random sources on the Internet, then who can we trust? /s

mindmypeelings.com/…/daily-dose-of-happiness-chem…

Isoprenoid,

If only I could be so grossly incandescent.

Isoprenoid,

Nintendo is a company that only wants make new stuff, innovations.

en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_video_games_featuring_…

en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_The_Legend_of_Zelda_me…

Isoprenoid,

I think the point is they go for new games instead of remakes.

…fandom.com/…/List_of_games_remade_for_Nintendo_S…

nintendolife.com/…/best-nintendo-remakes-and-rema…

Isoprenoid,

I didn’t realise so many non-Nintendo studios made games for Nintendo.

nintendolife.com/…/best-nintendo-remakes-and-rema…

List Length: 41

Nintendo Developed Games: 21

Nintendo Published Games: 41

I think the point is [Nintendo goes] for new games instead of remakes.

Isoprenoid,

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

“Those aren’t remakes, they’re completely different games.”

Isoprenoid,

https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/1e52ae9d-cac2-4730-8df2-21cebde0785f.jpeg

Isoprenoid,

“Subsidies go in, e-bikes go out. You can’t explain that.”

Isoprenoid,

Don’t fish in the company’s pool.

Isoprenoid, (edited )

Meeting people at work is the worst way to meet people.

“Oh hey. Our major thing in common is that we’re both working for the same business.

Lets hook up so that we can be constantly reminded of work when we see each other.

On top of that: if we break up (which is highly likely) it’ll get awkward at the place where we gain money to pay for necessities.”

No thanks.

Edit: Also the reason why Korea has a low birth rate isn’t due to “not dating at work”.

link.springer.com/chapter/…/978-3-031-29666-6_9

Isoprenoid,

It’s rage bait, that’s why it’s spreading. Do your part, downvote and move on.

https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/2d2e3963-f03f-4204-a85e-6e34d2cdac80.jpeg

Isoprenoid,

Now, now, don’t be hasty. Sony can still screw it up somehow.

Isoprenoid,

what would be one more if I hadn’t already had a PSN account.

One more attack vector to gain access to all your other accounts across the internet.

Isoprenoid,

Same here. The “stretching the space vertically” looks like it’s elongated it horizontally to me.

Isoprenoid, (edited )

I wasn’t arguing for the existence of god.

Let me break this down:

  • “There is a god.” --> Burden of proof
  • "There is no god." --> Burden of proof
  • "Hey, man. I don’t know." —> No burden of proof
Isoprenoid,

No, you can’t prove that something never happens or that something doesn’t exist.

Science, philosophy, and mathematics say otherwise.

en.wikipedia.org/…/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#P…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_impossibility

Isoprenoid,

Negative claims require evidence.

Otherwise a safety engineer can go to a regulator and say “There are no structural issues with this building.” He is claiming there are no issues, he needs to back that up with evidence.

Your Jedi mind tricks won’t work on me. 😜

Isoprenoid,

“There is enough evidence to be confident there aren’t structural problems” is what they’re really saying.

Bro, the graphite is not there. Everything is completely normal.

Isoprenoid, (edited )

If you’re claiming my fridge has no tiny invisible pink elephants you are welcome to provide evidence.

I will make no claims on the matter and thus have to provide no evidence either way.

Edit: I think you’re confusing me for the other guy.

Isoprenoid,

Believing claims on the grounds that they haven’t been disproven is just bad epistemology

Well, it’s a good thing that wasn’t my position.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • cisconetworking
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •