@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

K0W4LSK1

@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com

We are fucked so why not be nice to each other

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Honestly they fucked themselves they could have pivoted at the top of the hype. even like start selling PC parts or something. obviously the business was failing and they got bought out to prove a point to wall street no other reason. They fucked a great opportunity

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

You might need the lib32 version or have the wrong version of Vulkan it looks similiar to this issue: bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=286118

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Happy gaming :) glad I could help

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

It’s the reason we have so many birth complications. Why do you think we are the only animal on the planet that is bipedal all the time? It’s actually really mind bending how we survived and thrived

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

haha got me there should have said mammals

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I don’t know I’m fairly new to Linux but from my understanding from the comments on reddit and how those commands work. It wouldn’t work it’s not the dotnet48 installer itself that doesn’t work it’s some file in the windows folder and proton forcing windows 10. With how windows errors work they don’t. it’s impossible to actually find the problem. Look in that windows folder it’s huge

I forgot to mention when you do this it increases the pfx size from like 300 mb to 1.6gb

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

And when he went back to tell them they killed him

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Holy shit I almost spit my coffee all over my arch ThinkPad that’s funny

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Maybe consciousness is fundamental and matter and spacetime are derived from it

edit: this comment is a bit controversial to people just want to say why not explore this idea we spent over 50 years on string theory where has that gotten us

Donald Hoffman Ted talk on consciousness

Papers by Bernardo Kastrup

Please just take the time to learn more before you come at me lol

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Sure firstly id like to say these are theories just as anything in science starts as. I am not saying this is fact by any means and could be totally wrong. here are some sources:

Donald Hoffman Ted talk

Papers by Bernardo Kastrup

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Idk that would depend on what you believe is fundamental Fringe science baby!

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Ok but how do you actually remove consciousness from the experiment? Seriously curious because from my point of view no matter what a conscience agent has to check the results

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

What is magic dude Fucking biobots man

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Thanks for being open minded and at least looking at the data before you draw your conclusion

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

You’re my favourite person in this comment section. never stop learning!

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Sure I agree it could be that as well but there is no actual way to prove that. Since we don’t actually understand what it is or how it works we can’t remove it, therefore with materialism at this point it’s not provable either way. it’s also another theory and why I started my original comment with maybe. It’s better to explore that data in my opinion then outright deny it without any actual evidence proving it’s not. Occams razor is a cop out here

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

philosophynow.org/…/The_Case_For_Panpsychism
There is a case for even the most fundamental particles having a basic form of consciousness. And there is studies and theories being created this is just new science and extremely hard for materialists to wrap their heads around I understand that. here are some other sources you can check out for data that I posted on another comment as well Donald Hoffman Ted talkPapers from bernardo

And I want to finish off I do not fully believe these theories. They are that just theories just like most things in science start off and still are today.

K0W4LSK1, (edited )
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

If the conscious observer thing were true, what would it decide is consciousness? Would it require sapience? Sentience? Does it happen for dolphins? Apes? Monkeys? Mice? Tardigrades? What level of synapse connections is it waiting for to decide that’s enough? What about humans born without a brain? Can they not see anything? This hypothesis requires so many weird assumptions that it’s less than useless. A god existing makes more sense.

Idk why that is so hard for you to even ponder

Science requires testable and verifiable hypothesis. If they can’t be falsified they aren’t a part of science. They’re a belief system. That’s fine to have, but don’t mix it with science. All you’ll do is end up not accepting more data as we learn it because you’re filtering it through faith.

So string theory isn’t science either show me where string theory has been proven in any sort of way

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Nothing here has anything to do with consciousness. You can recreate this experiment with no one in the room and it will behave exactly the same, and has a sound (if very confusing conventionally) mathematical cause.

First I was commenting on a meme wasn’t expecting these comments lol. but we are active in the experiment that is the point to show that it changes states because we observe Why does that happen and why don’t we don’t know it’s position til observed. It doesn’t matter if we are in the room or not we could be 1000 miles away watching on webcam and the same thing happens because we observed it and my side note QM is fucking magic dude

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I can obviously ponder it. I’ve shown that. It’s just that there’s no reason to believe it’s any more real than Harry Potter is. It may make you feel nice, but it doesn’t do anything. If consciousness can’t be defined by whoever is positing the idea then it’s not useful to consider.

You thought about it for a second and actually thought yeah living things having a conscience is fiction? What I don’t really know how to respond to that If consciousness is just derived from the activity in our brain it’s not hard to assume that animals atleast are aware of their conscious being on some small way. That is most definitely more believable then god or Harry Potter.

Just because something can’t be defined yet doesn’t mean we won’t eventually be able to. But you know we gotta get there and again I am not saying these theories are right I commented on a meme.

I love what you said about string theory I would agree but you said it’s wrong and maybe this is too and maybe something useful will come out of it but maybe not.

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Sadly lemmy.CA won’t be far behind

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

You do use arch… Ps I use arch

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

From what I see these onlyfans girls are making she could probably buy the house

K0W4LSK1,
@K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Look up the guerilla skeptics

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • anitta
  • Durango
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • vwfavf
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • PowerRangers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • tester
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • All magazines
    •