Broad, multi-party support for the Liberal child care legislation may bode well for the program’s durability. And it can also be read as an implicit endorsement of the Trudeau government’s particular — and muscular —use of the federal spending power.
This is kind of an aside, but... I often feel like there is a negative connotation with the word "activist" in government. I think a lot of this is fallout from people calling the courts "activist" when they are supposed to be purely objective and non-partisan.
I don't think this needs to be the case in parliament though. I admit, for certain administrative ends, things need to be objective. However, for governance that is rooted in partisanship, sometimes ideology overrides that need for pure objective policy.
Having parties that aim for some ideological objectives helps to accrue and galvanize support. It gives voters something to believe in, and strive for.
Add comment