PogoWasRight,

RiteAid was just one of many victims of the by . Now they're being sued by plaintiffs who call them "reckless" and "negligent" for not having encrypted the protected health information.

Imagine if every covered entity or business associate who didn't encrypt got hacked was sued over a vendor breach.

In this day and age where healthcare entities are under siege, is it somewhat reckless or negligent not to encrypt? And if not, will it ever be generally considered reckless and negligent?

https://www.databreaches.net/rite-aid-one-of-many-victims-in-moveit-breach-sued-for-negligence/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Cybersecurity
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • mdbf
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • megavids
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines