@blakeNaccarato
Yeah basically what im saying is that "doing random stuff and expecting other people to make it intelligible for everyone else" is a bad strategy if we want publicly funded science to keep existing. The idea of "scicomm" as optional, not as a byproduct of doing our work in such a way that it was already intrinsically part of an understandable whole is bad to me. The existing system is unsustainable, so we either change it or it gets gutted out of existence