baggins, 28 days ago (edited 28 days ago) The guy in the recent case had his business paying the rent for the condo where he lived. The judgment is against the business that was paying the rent, not the guy himself. Which is why her statement is qualified with the word “individual”. Dude had the business paying his rent because “it was easier from a bookkeeping point of view”.
The guy in the recent case had his business paying the rent for the condo where he lived. The judgment is against the business that was paying the rent, not the guy himself. Which is why her statement is qualified with the word “individual”.
Dude had the business paying his rent because “it was easier from a bookkeeping point of view”.