irreticent,
@irreticent@lemmy.world avatar

GDPR is a specific new thing less than 10 years old and has no equivalent in US law.

That’s not entirely true. California has a GDPR-like privacy law now:

“The requirements aren’t insignificant, and the fines could add up”

See also:

“This bill would enact the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018. Beginning January 1, 2020, the bill would grant a consumer a right to request a business to disclose the categories and specific pieces of personal information that it collects about the consumer, the categories of sources from which that information is collected, the business purposes for collecting or selling the information, and the categories of 3rd parties with which the information is shared. The bill would require a business to make disclosures about the information and the purposes for which it is used. The bill would grant a consumer the right to request deletion of personal information and would require the business to delete upon receipt of a verified request, as specified. The bill would grant a consumer a right to request that a business that sells the consumer’s personal information, or discloses it for a business purpose, disclose the categories of information that it collects and categories of information and the identity of 3rd parties to which the information was sold or disclosed. The bill would require a business to provide this information in response to a verifiable consumer request. The bill would authorize a consumer to opt out of the sale of personal information by a business and would prohibit the business from discriminating against the consumer for exercising this right, including by charging the consumer who opts out a different price or providing the consumer a different quality of goods or services, except if the difference is reasonably related to value provided by the consumer’s data. The bill would authorize businesses to offer financial incentives for collection of personal information. The bill would prohibit a business from selling the personal information of a consumer under 16 years of age, unless affirmatively authorized, as specified, to be referred to as the right to opt in. The bill would prescribe requirements for receiving, processing, and satisfying these requests from consumers. The bill would prescribe various definitions for its purposes and would define “personal information” with reference to a broad list of characteristics and behaviors, personal and commercial, as well as inferences drawn from this information. The bill would prohibit the provisions described above from restricting the ability of the business to comply with federal, state, or local laws, among other things.”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • games@sh.itjust.works
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • khanakhh
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Durango
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • JUstTest
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines