mp3, (edited )
@mp3@lemmy.ca avatar

For my server I simply switched to Debian and add the packages I need on top, without all that proprietary snap crap.

For desktop I’m tempted to switch to an atomic distro like Fedora Silverblue (Gnome) or Fedora Onyx (Budgie), and for the Steam Deck I’d go with Bazzite.

boomer,

Time to move on to the Ubuntu of the Arch stream, Manjaro.

imnapr,
@imnapr@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Definitely time to just use debian, mint MX, or pop os even. I did a lot of hopping though and I’ve settled on Nobara KDE. Mint was great but the Bluetooth was finicky for some reason, and debian is mostly just ubuntu with some gui stuff removed. PopOS is basically just debian until COSMIC but still good too.

SpaceCadet, (edited )
@SpaceCadet@feddit.nl avatar

Just go Debian.

Ubuntu used to bring a bit of spit and polish at a time when most Linux distros lacked that. Nowadays it brings nothing worthwhile to the table anymore, it’s just brand recognition, but what it does bring is aggravation for experienced users.

I had this realization a few years ago when I found myself fighting against 20.04 and I asked myself: what exactly is Ubuntu doing for me that plain Debian can’t? The answer was nothing really, so I moved all my Ubuntu VMs over to Debian Bullseye and never looked back.

Linkerbaan,
@Linkerbaan@lemmy.world avatar

I dont mind snaps but blocking deb installs by default on file clicks is a bad look.

RubberElectrons,
@RubberElectrons@lemmy.world avatar

I was a long-time Xubuntu fan, tried Ubuntu directly from canonical for my new laptop.

It’s been a bit rocky, all things considered. I think I’m trying something else next time, maybe mint or whatever. Maybe Xubuntu, but only if this snap shit has been cut out.

erici,

I don’t get the anger. Just install your software as snaps. What’s the problem?

BigMikeInAustin,

It’s almost like you didn’t read the article, because this specific point is addressed.

kronarbob,

I’ve seen a video where the guy installed steam on Ubuntu 24.04. Of course it was the snap. The guy usually tests distro to see of it’s easy to game on it. If the drivers are easy to install, etc…

He usually launches steam, then tests Valheim, Overwatch, Tomb Raider and cyberpunk.

Overwatch didn’t launch, cyberpunk neither. Valheim reported that a service didn’t launch. Tomb raider was OK.

Then he uninstalled the steam snap and installed the .deb one. Everything worked.

Enforcing packages is already something that people don’t appreciate on Linux, enforcing packages that don’t work is surprisingly hated.

Ubuntu is supposed to be a distro for beginners, how am I supposed to recommand a distro when I have no confidence the applications will work ?

DriftinGrifter,

mint or manjaro are better anyways

kronarbob,

Mint is far better, I usually recommand it. But Ubuntu is still more popular.

I didn’t use Manjaro in many years, so I can’t judge it. The biggest problem I see with Manjaro is that it has access to AUR.

Manjaro has its own repos, and they take more time to release packages than Arch, which can be a good thing stability wise. But if you have applications from AUR installed then you might have conflicts with the dependencies needed and the dependencies used by the system.

As I said, I didn’t use Manjaro in a while, so I don’t know if it still a problem. If it is, then it’s a shame that the biggest advantage of Arch, the AUR, become that much a risk for the system.

BigMikeInAustin,

But how is a new person supposed to know that? Ubuntu is still at the top of many charts. And has years of previous positive reviews.

DriftinGrifter,

i feel like anyone switching os should look a bit into what they entail and then its our responsibility to tell people what is better

erici,

I don’t use Ubuntu myself but I put Zorin on my dad’s computer. He 82 and he doesn’t know what an operating system is. He seems to be able to use it though 🤷

leadore,
leadore avatar

Ubuntu has long suffered from NIH syndrome, constantly inventing its own non-standard components (snaps, Unity, etc) and trying to make them "win" by forcing them on their own users. Reminds me of Microsoft with its non-standard Internet Explorer, its own non-standard version of Java and others.

The lesson is to use a Community distro, not a Corporate distro. When the distro's goals align with its community's, even a distro based on Ubuntu will usually be better than straight Ubuntu. For example Mint keeps the good things about Ubuntu (in Mint's opinion of course), removes the bad things like Snaps, and adds other features that the community wants that Ubuntu won't (like built-in Flatpak support among other things).

IcePee,

This is why I moved to Linux Mint. Then, when I got tired of having to reinstall the entire OS every time there’s a new version I moved again. Spare a thought for the poor saps who feel stuck with an OS from a single vendor. And sometimes even paying for the privilege. That being said fund open source. Freedom isn’t free.

leadore,
leadore avatar

Mint has an auto-upgrade tool so you don't have to reinstall each time. It used to be only for minor version upgrades but now you can auto-upgrade to a new major version as well. In any case there are plenty of great distros to choose from.

And yes! whatever distro (and other FLOSS software) you use, support them with a donation if you can! When you consider the value you are getting for free vs. what you'd be spending on proprietary software, it's not so hard to do and feels good too.

IcePee,

I was on Mint over 10 years ago and noped out of it when an auto update borked my system. I can’t remember what it was, and maybe if it happened to me today, I could work my way through it. But, as it stood at the time, I remember feeling rolling was the way to go.

pbjamm,
@pbjamm@beehaw.org avatar

Mint has been my goto desktop distro for many years now. It is everything Ubuntu used to be. For servers Debian is the answer.

For those that prefer non-debian based Linux then Fedora variants are the way to go.

MrShankles,

Also… the amount of money I’ve saved by being able to revive old hardware! I haven’t bought a new computer in 11 years. My computer before that (and still working) was a gift in 2006… that bitch is old enough to vote.

I have other computers that people have given to me because they were “just too old,” but for me, it was an upgrade. I revived a windows 98-era HP a few years ago, just so I could use the 9-pin connection to fix my bricked OG Xbox that I was modding.

Granted, I don’t game on PC or require heavy lifting (though I am saving for a personal build, because there’s some hobbies I just can’t do without a good desktop), but for everyday use, I have more than enough.

I currently have 4 “working” computers. Two of them are my main, one still needs to be “reinvigorated” (it’s 18 years old), and one is my server.

I have a 5th desktop that was given to me (because it was too slow/old), and it just recently crapped out on me (either because of windows bullshit, or a bad hdd. But I have my hunches). So it’s about to be revived when I have time.

Hardest part was getting my wife onboard with switching to Linux, instead of buying a new computer. But now she’s getting ready to switch her Mac to Linux because it’s been struggling. And I think she’s starting to realize that a brand-new computer isn’t really “necessary”, if all you’re doing is email, browsing web, and editing docs. Shit, our phones can handle most of that; you don’t need a $1k+ computer for that, or pay for windows software that will barely work on the hardware you have.

So yeah… end rant. Absolutely love how much Linux has breathed new life into my old hardware. Has saved me time and time again, as well as a bunch of money. I definitely need to throw a donation at a distro, cause they have saved me more than just money at this point

miracleorange,

The lesson is to use a Community distro, not a Corporate distro.

Okay, but you don’t see these kinds of complaints with Fedora or SUSE. While I don’t necessarily disagree with your core point (community is better), this doesn’t seem like an issue with corporations so much as an issue strictly with Canonical.

localhost443,

Been running KDE on fedora for the last 6 years after giving up on everything Ubuntu based back then. Haven’t thought to look elsewhere since as its been just fine

jjlinux,

I went through something similar 2 years ago. I was sold in PopOS, mainly because Debian based distros were easier to find help for. Almost 2 years ago I started using Fedora on my PC while still having PopOS on my laptop. Within 3 weeks I was setting my laptop up with Fedora as well, and I’ve never looked back (other than the regular distro-hopping bursts, lol).

localhost443, (edited )

It has been very good & stable over the last few years. I switched because kbuntus ancient kernel caused me issues so I needed something more current, and its worked ever since so I never looked elsewhere. Running Linux isn’t a hobby for me, these are my work systems, so I don’t hop without a push.

Edit: I’ve just rolled out fedora 40 and plasma 6 is running great

jjlinux,

Yeah, I get you. My PC is for work, and my laptop can be used for work, but it’s mostly my gaming rig (together with my Steam Deck), and my distro-hopping unit as well.

I used Fedora 40 with KDE 6 since the Beta, but KDE and I just don’t get along, so I’m on Gnome 46 on both devices now.

One of the huge advantages on Linux is that you can be back in business in 20 minutes if you choose to try another distro. Similar to Windows and Mac, said Noone ever 🤣🤣

Miaou,

You’re being purposefully obtuse. Corporate distro means “by and for companies” which rolling releases are not

miracleorange, (edited )

Okay? OpenSUSE Leap is a point release by and for companies. While Fedora isn’t necessarily a server distro, it IS a point release designed with enterprise use in mind.

If we look at both of their strictly enterprise counterparts, I’ve never heard of any complaints about SUSE and any complaints with RHEL I’ve heard are with source availability. Neither of them have the mega amounts of bad publicity of Canonical.

citizensv,

That’s precisely I changed to MX Linux. I won’t use ubuntu for a long time I guess.

gerdesj, (edited )

“I understand that Canonical has every right to make the decision about their product.”

That seems fair. There are loads of distros available so why not try something else if you don’t like Ubuntu?

Linux and other mainstream Unices such as FreeBSD or OpenBSD int al (that’s not something I ever thought I’d be able to say a few decades back) are not Windows or Apples or whatevs. You do you and not them!

If Ubuntu fails to scratch your itch then move on. Debian is the upstream for Ubuntu so you’ll probably be fine with that instead. There is loads of documentation for Debian via the wiki etc and of course most Ubuntu docs will apply as well.

BigMikeInAustin,

You only got part of the quote, and not the part that really is what the article is about.

I understand that Canonical has every right to make the decision about their product. You want to promote Snap over Deb, fine. But don’t do it in a deceiving manner.

And there is a pretty reasonable middle ground:

If you would like to keep your ‘Snap store’ deb-free, fine! At least have the decency to provide Gdebi by default for local deb file installation.

xnx,

This along with other things is another reason why i will continue to recommend noobs start with pop os and more advanced users to use bazzite.

I do wish pop os would change their name to cosmic os though. Their current name is too close to poop os 😅

pelotron,
@pelotron@midwest.social avatar

Don’t forget the random punctuation mixed in. It’s like the title of a kids’ tv show.

Dangy,
@Dangy@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

CosmOS?

Tlaloc_Temporal,

That’s fantastic! Obviously no one will ever use it.

pbjamm,
@pbjamm@beehaw.org avatar

or something more cheerful like GladOS

force,

never thought of “poop os” but I think Pop!_OS is a stupid name, it’s the only reason I avoided it and chose Nobara instead lol

feoh,

I get it.

I don’t love Snaps either.

However, a thing I try to remember and wish others would as well is simply this: Canonical is a company. Their goal is to make money. They are not out to create the ultimate free as in freedom Linux distribution.

This does (to my mind) not make them evil, and ESPECIALLY doesn’t make the folks who work there evil. It makes them participants in the great horrible game that is Capitalism, and expecting anything else from them is going to lead to heartache, as you’ve seen.

If you want a Linux distro that shares your preferences and won’t try to jam snaps down your throat, you might consider giving Debian a whirl as many others have.

Continuing to ride the Ubuntu train and raging against the dying of the light when it continues chugging in the direction it’s been headed for YEARS seems … futile :)

planish,

How do snaps make money for Canonical?

caseyweederman,

There’s no way to install a snap except through Canonical’s snap store (or snap store proxy, which gets them from Canonical’s snap store).
They’re charging for kernel security live patches. They charge for LTS. If they get enough buy-in re: snaps, they’re going to do the only thing a for-profit company can do.

AMDIsOurLord,

Red Hat and SUSE also charge for extended support, it’s literally the only fucking way to make money off of a distro

Canonical still offers 5 years standard at the enormous cost of 0.0$

caseyweederman,

Are you under the impression that they write all the patches?

AMDIsOurLord,

No, but they actually do write some patches and they also do all the menial work, testing and verification to keep a piece of software serviceable for 10 years

If you think it’s easy, go and attempt it yourself. The greatest cure for people talking shit about needed effort, according to my experience…

feoh,

I’m not gonna speak for Canonical but snaps enable commercial vendors to more readily ship their apps on the Ubuntu platform.

Chakravanti, (edited )

Money is literally the very incarnation of evil via the Talisman it bears.

If they trying to make money then they are, not a fiber of otherwise, Evil.

You’re decision to not recognize the blatant & obvious Talisman does not make you correct. It’s not your choice. It’s the choice of that occult chant and signature.

feoh,

Humans are inherently evil. There is but a thin veneer we call “civilization” that stops of from beating each other to death with whatever object can be brought to hand.

And what does any of this have to do with the price of tea in China? :)

Chakravanti,

Humans are evil like chimpanzees are evil. That’s not evil. Killing humans is not inherently evil. I doubt you understand.

I don’t know Chinese occult but I do know that of the on that scribed the ritual onto the dollar bill. Seems fancy but it is nothing less than our planets xenocide being held against the loss of power to the handover, happening celestially in our solar systems orbit within a small sector of our galaxy, to women.

Gender is practically the next level of existence from the loop. Stupid as fuck these magicians are. The only removal from existence is them. Down to their soul being tortured “forever” in a dimension I can’t even describe let alone explain.

The rest of us can reincarnate anywhere else in the universe if they don’t pull the trick on you to think that money is anything but a planned lying trick to suck the sense and choice of reality from the soul.

You do not understand evil until you realize that the money facilitating the AI. Best explanation of what AI is the episode of Wild Blue Yonder from Doctor Who’s most recent shows. This is roughly the concept. The “reality” (not the right word but close because we don’t have a million words to describe it let alone name it) is that this existence, the entire universe will be worse than not existing. I cannot even start to describe it but if you’ve read any H.P. Lovecraft, think that Cthulhu would be a good president to vote for.

IA! Fthagn!

Tundra,

Agreed.

For any (k)ubuntu refugees, do as I did and switch to Debian!

Interstellar_1,

Or as I did and switch to fedora! (Debian’s also a really good option)

feoh,

Nice to see that KDE is so well supported! I’d been running Manjaro KDE the last time I had Linux installed on my desktop but I may give Debian a try this time around.

I_Miss_Daniel, (edited )
I_Miss_Daniel avatar

Baah. KBIN just ate my reply.

Point form since I forgot to save to clipboard first.

Tried mint - booted to black screen
Tried ubuntu - got silly crashes like in the post trying to install stuff. It also wanted me to sign up for some sort of support package with 5 free devices to get updates or something. Also, trackpad scrolling was uncontrollable. Would scroll up half a screen or more as I lifted my fingers off.
Tried fedora - only 100% and 200% zoom option, and no right click.

Managed to fix the fedora issues with some command line found on Google and a gnome customising addon.

n00b here, just playing. Can't migrate fully as I need VBA and Playit Live etc.

Valmond,

I do wonder what kind of gardware you have… And if it’s maybe defective?

I_Miss_Daniel,
I_Miss_Daniel avatar

Asus F555D - 12G RAM, AMD R8 M350DX GPU and a sticker that says Radeon Dual Graphics. That's probably what was tripping up the system booting to a black screen.

hactar42,

I took a similar path but eventually ended up on openSUSE for my desktop. I’ve been pretty happy with it. I can’t think of a single issue that I wasn’t able to quickly resolve. I even got CUDA installed and working in under an hour.

Aatube, (edited )

Time to switch to mbin! The features you might miss are new comment highlighting and the all content view, but these are being worked out and mbin still has, otherwise, way more features.

fl42v,

Idk, I probably haven’t used Debian derivatives long enough, but isn’t installing random .deb-s somewhat of a bad practice? I mean, repos exist for a reason (ignoring the fact they usually have like 3 packages in the official repos)

DmMacniel,

But even if it is, it shouldn’t prevent installing released debs you find for example on GitHub repositories.

Kristof12,
@Kristof12@lemmy.ml avatar

But it seems to be a bit better when using the terminal

Aatube,

But most Windows emigrants don't use the terminal

atzanteol,

It doesn’t prevent you from doing so. It just doesn’t launch the store app when you double click a . deb.

Shinji_Ikari,
@Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net avatar

A lot of software wont be distributed with a PPA to add.

Additionally, debs are useful for offline installations, with apt you’re able to recursively download a package and all of it’s dependencies as deb files, then transfer those over to the offline machine and install in bulk.

That being said I’ve never had great luck with the software center, it’s always felt broken. I’ll typically just dpkg -I <pkg>.

possiblylinux127,

Yes, depending on the context

Frederic,

You should try MX, it’s Debian based, and they have their own repo full of .deb, up to date, never break

ursakhiin,

Some things we would want to install aren’t in the official repos. Downloading the deb file is a solution to that for newer users.

Harry_h0udini,
@Harry_h0udini@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Give a shot for Fedora!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • InstantRegret
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • vwfavf
  • rosin
  • PowerRangers
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • anitta
  • everett
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • All magazines