Just because y’all have medicine, active lifestyles, balanced diets, less workplace stress, and reasonable portion sizes doesn’t mean anything in the face of our diet that contains enough corn and tomato to put us at eating slightly more vegetables than many of you.
Vegetable is a culinary category not a biological one, tomato falls strongly in the culinary side of vegetable not fruit. It would be weird to add tomato to your dessert unlike everything from currants to bananas to watermelon.
And corn being a vegetable is something I have to assume our government lied to us about or something. It’s a really weird cultural thing. Maybe because it’s a plant that’s easy to grill and we’re afraid to try grilling bok choy.
Huh so you just make up categories in your head based on what goes in a fruit salad and what can be grilled to justify the fact that you don’t know.
See this is why going to school is important. I recommend reading up on why produce are either fruit or vegetable.
There’s only one sense, the biological one. You don’t recategorize things based on the ingredients of recipes. That’s just ridiculous.
The only government conspiracy i see here is the degradation of the education system where everyone knows AR-15 means armalite rifle 15 and thinks tomato is a vegetable because it doesn’t go with fruits.
What I’m trying to express is that savory fruits are better treated as vegetables than fruits from a nutritional and culinary perspective which is good, since there is no such thing botanically as a vegetable. It’s similar to how usually roots are vegetables but some like potatoes and yams are better treated as more similar to grains in a nutritional perspective due to their high starch content. We’re also currently moving from treating mushrooms as vegetables to more like meats or nuts due to their primary macronutrient being protein and their flavor profile being umami. The same is happening with beans.
Followup: So the giant whale skeleton is actually in Hintze Hall and not where the whale icon is on the map, which caused us a fair amount of confusion. But besides that, basically perfect.
Interesting it says roughly 80/20 split of land, but it includes Antarctica as land. I wonder what percent of the world population is on land hemisphere? Probably like 95%.
I don’t even know how populated the southern cone is, I mostly think of ranches and windswept shores. The water hemisphere might be almost entirely Australia and Indonesia by population.
It’s also interesting to note that the pole of the land hemisphere is in France, where the enlightenment and the modern world got it’s start. I’m pretty sure that’s a coincidence though, it’s no historical crossroads when you factor in the surrounding oceans, deserts and ice caps.
map_enthusiasts
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.