tal, (edited )
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

The problem is that “AI” doesn’t really entail any concrete technical capabilities, so if the term is seen in a positive light, people will abuse the limits of the definition as far as they are able.

Not really a new phenomenon. Been done in the past as well, with “AI” as well as other things.

With “self-driving cars” being vague – someone could advertise a car that could park itself “self driving” – we introduced newer terms that were linked to actual characteristics, like the SAE level system for vehicle autonomy.

Might need to do something similar with AI.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • magazineikmin
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • JUstTest
  • tester
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines